These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13526486)

  • 61. The impact of shared sanitation facilities on diarrheal diseases with and without an environmental reservoir: a modeling study.
    Just MR; Carden SW; Li S; Baker KK; Gambhir M; Fung IC
    Pathog Glob Health; 2018 Jun; 112(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 29874978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Pit latrine effluent infiltration into groundwater: the Epworth case study.
    Chidavaenzi M; Bradley M; Jere M; Nhandara C
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 2000; 105():171-7. PubMed ID: 10842811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Association between intestinal parasitic infections and type of sanitation system in rural El Salvador.
    Corrales LF; Izurieta R; Moe CL
    Trop Med Int Health; 2006 Dec; 11(12):1821-31. PubMed ID: 17176347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparing Sanitation Delivery Modalities in Urban Informal Settlement Schools: A Randomized Trial in Nairobi, Kenya.
    Bohnert K; Chard AN; Mwaki A; Kirby AE; Muga R; Nagel CL; Thomas EA; Freeman MC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 27916914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The effects of improved sanitation on diarrheal prevalence, incidence, and duration in children under five in the SNNPR State, Ethiopia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Jung S; Doh YA; Bizuneh DB; Beyene H; Seong J; Kwon H; Kim Y; Habteyes GN; Tefera Y; Cha S
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17(1):204. PubMed ID: 27089872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Towards sustainable sanitation management: Establishing the costs and willingness to pay for emptying and transporting sludge in rural districts with high rates of access to latrines.
    Balasubramanya S; Evans B; Hardy R; Ahmed R; Habib A; Asad NS; Rahman M; Hasan M; Dey D; Fletcher L; Camargo-Valero MA; Chaitanya Rao K; Fernando S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0171735. PubMed ID: 28323885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Sanitation, community environments, and childhood diarrhoea in rural Zimbabwe.
    Root GP
    J Health Popul Nutr; 2001 Jun; 19(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11503350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Quantifying accessibility and use of improved sanitation: towards a comprehensive indicator of the need for sanitation interventions.
    Park MJ; Clements AC; Gray DJ; Sadler R; Laksono B; Stewart DE
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():30299. PubMed ID: 27452598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Why latrines are not used: communities' perceptions and practices regarding latrines in a Taenia solium endemic rural area in Eastern Zambia.
    Thys S; Mwape KE; Lefèvre P; Dorny P; Marcotty T; Phiri AM; Phiri IK; Gabriël S
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2015 Mar; 9(3):e0003570. PubMed ID: 25739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Household latrine use, maintenance and acceptability in rural Zinder, Niger.
    Diallo MO; Hopkins DR; Kane MS; Niandou S; Amadou A; Kadri B; Amza A; Emerson PM; Zingeser JA
    Int J Environ Health Res; 2007 Dec; 17(6):443-52. PubMed ID: 18027197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Contributing to the debate on categorising shared sanitation facilities as 'unimproved': An account based on field researchers' observations and householders' opinions in three regions, Tanzania.
    Massa K; Kilamile F; Safari E; Seleman A; Mwakitalima A; Balengayabo JG; Kassile T; Mangesho PE; Mubyazi GM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0185875. PubMed ID: 29107947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Invited Perspective: Sanitation Innovation Holds Promise but Must Consider Risks to Users.
    Brown J
    Environ Health Perspect; 2022 Jan; 130(1):11301. PubMed ID: 34985306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Pop--the festival challenge to local authorities.
    Nichols RJ
    R Soc Health J; 1971; 91(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 5569791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Dry Sanitation.
    Hospital (Lond 1886); 1895 Feb; 17(439):360. PubMed ID: 29830769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Risk assessment to groundwater of pit latrine rural sanitation policy in developing country settings.
    Back JO; Rivett MO; Hinz LB; Mackay N; Wanangwa GJ; Phiri OL; Songola CE; Thomas MAS; Kumwenda S; Nhlema M; Miller AVM; Kalin RM
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 613-614():592-610. PubMed ID: 28926813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Advantages and limitations for users of double pit pour-flush latrines: a qualitative study in rural Bangladesh.
    Hussain F; Clasen T; Akter S; Bawel V; Luby SP; Leontsini E; Unicomb L; Barua MK; Thomas B; Winch PJ
    BMC Public Health; 2017 May; 17(1):515. PubMed ID: 28545427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A pre-cast concrete pit latrine top.
    SCHULZ KH
    J Trop Med Hyg; 1956 Nov; 59(11):269-70. PubMed ID: 13377457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Pit Latrine Fecal Sludge Resistance Using a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Low Income Areas in Mzuzu City, Malawi.
    Chirwa CF; Hall RP; Krometis LH; Vance EA; Edwards A; Guan T; Holm RH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 28165378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The dry pit latrine.
    FRASER ND
    Lepr Rev; 1958 Apr; 29(2):114-5. PubMed ID: 13526486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.