BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13527840)

  • 21. Lymph node detection by MRI before and after a systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Klerkx WM; Heintz AP; Mali WP; de Kort GA; Takahara T; van Dorst EB; Peeters PH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):315-8. PubMed ID: 19481787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is there a place for a less extensive radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer patients?
    Scambia G; Ferrandina G; Distefano M; Fagotti A; Manfredi R; Zannoni GF; Mancuso S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Nov; 83(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 11606092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical and experimental studies on the so-called lymphocyst which develops after radical hysterectomy in cancer of the uterine cervix.
    MORI N
    J Jpn Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1955 Apr; 2(2):178-203. PubMed ID: 13286539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Re: "Rate of para-aortic lymph node micrometastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer".
    Chéreau E; Ballester M; Daraï E
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):689; author reply 690. PubMed ID: 21620449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intraoperative sentinel node identification in early stage cervical cancer using a combination of radiolabeled albumin injection and isosulfan blue dye injection.
    Martínez-Palones JM; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Roca I; Xercavins J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Mar; 92(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 14984951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sentinel lymph node biopsy vs. pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: is it time to change the gold standard?
    Gortzak-Uzan L; Jimenez W; Nofech-Mozes S; Ismiil N; Khalifa MA; Dubé V; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Jan; 116(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 19875161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Some issues related to sentinel lymph nodes with cervical cancer].
    Sun JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 39(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 14989975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Challenges of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer in pregnant women: techniques and tips.
    Nagase Y; Kobayashi E; Takiuchi T; Kodama M; Nakagawa S; Endo M; Kimura T
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):2017-2018. PubMed ID: 32998857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of uterine cervix carcinoma.
    Neveu ME; Bentivegna E; Gouy S
    J Visc Surg; 2017 Apr; 154(2):115-122. PubMed ID: 28153518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer: the standardization of surgical procedure and its clinical impact.
    Benedetti Panici P; Basile S; Angioli R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 19157526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reassessment of pelvic lymph node debulking in advanced cervical cancer.
    Tammela J; Bundy B; Odunsi K
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Mar; 92(3):1014-5. PubMed ID: 14984980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Clinical study of sentinel lymph node detection guided radical abdominal trachelectomy].
    Du XL; Sheng XG; Zhong Y; Li DP; Liu NF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 48(5):348-51. PubMed ID: 24016477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer--surgical anatomy and proposal for a new classification system.
    Cibula D; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Jan; 116(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19837449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective study of sentinel lymph node biopsy without further pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with sentinel lymph node-negative cervical cancer.
    Niikura H; Okamoto S; Otsuki T; Yoshinaga K; Utsunomiya H; Nagase S; Takano T; Ito K; Watanabe M; Yaegashi N
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Sep; 22(7):1244-50. PubMed ID: 22864335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does debulking of enlarged positive lymph nodes improve survival in different gynaecological cancers?
    Somashekhar SP
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):870-83. PubMed ID: 26043964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis in FIGO stage IA2-IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: Revisiting the role of surgical assessment.
    Del Carmen MG; Pareja R; Melamed A; Rodriguez J; Greer A; Clark RM; Rice LW
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):406-411. PubMed ID: 30017539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lymphoscintigraphy in radical vaginal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Wydra D; Sawicki S; Emerich J; Romanowicz G
    Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2004; 7(2):187-8. PubMed ID: 15968609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Results of radical radioisotope surgery of cervix cancer].
    Gitsch E; Philipp K
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 May; 49(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 2737434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new method to aid complete lymphadenectomy in radical treatment of cancer of the cervix.
    Pharaon SR; Al-Saleh WM
    Saudi Med J; 2002 May; 23(5):546-7. PubMed ID: 12070578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for pelvic and lumbar-aortic lymphadenectomy. A 11-year experience.
    Socolov RV; Raudrantz D; Golfier F; Socolov D; Vaudoyer F
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2005; 109(4):804-9. PubMed ID: 16610178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.