These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Single-stimulus judgments of loudness as a function of presentation-interval. BEVAN W; PRITCHARD JF; REED WG Am J Psychol; 1962 Dec; 75():612-8. PubMed ID: 13967903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness. GARNER WR J Exp Psychol; 1953 Nov; 46(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 13109142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus spacing and the judgment of loudness. STEVENS JC J Exp Psychol; 1958 Sep; 56(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 13575727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients. Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers. Narendran MM; Humes LE Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of vehicle color on loudness judgments. Menzel D; Fastl H; Graf R; Hellbrück J J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2477-9. PubMed ID: 18529164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Context effects and the validity of loudness scales. GARNER WR J Exp Psychol; 1954 Sep; 48(3):218-24. PubMed ID: 13201730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of context upon judgments of pitch differences. KOESTER T; SCHOENFELD WN J Exp Psychol; 1946 Oct; 36():417-30. PubMed ID: 21000773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Loudness functions with air and bone conduction stimulation in normal-hearing subjects using a categorical loudness scaling procedure. Stenfelt S; Zeitooni M Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():85-92. PubMed ID: 23562775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid. Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of "subliminal" tones upon the judgment of loudness. BEVAN W; PRITCHARD JF J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jul; 66():23-9. PubMed ID: 13967904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The development of context effects in halfloudness judgments. GARNER WR J Exp Psychol; 1959 Sep; 58():212-9. PubMed ID: 13826609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects. Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overall judgment of loudness of time-varying sounds. Schlittenlacher J; Hashimoto T; Kuwano S; Namba S J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):1841. PubMed ID: 29092556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli. Shafiro V Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]