These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13545378)

  • 1. Comparison of the gross biological effects of rotary and ultrasonic instruments on guinea pig incisors.
    KENNEDY JJ
    Am J Phys Med; 1958 Jun; 37(3):132-4. PubMed ID: 13545378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of 10 different rotary cutting instruments. Part I: Turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):248-61. PubMed ID: 19328278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison in vivo of the first tapered and nontapered instruments that bind at the apical constriction.
    Kfir A; Rosenberg E; Fuss Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Sep; 102(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 16920549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Undergraduate teaching and clinical use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments: a survey of French dental schools.
    Arbab-Chirani R; Vulcain JM
    Int Endod J; 2004 May; 37(5):320-4. PubMed ID: 15086753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
    Lopes HP; Ferreira AA; Elias CN; Moreira EJ; de Oliveira JC; Siqueira JF
    J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1013-6. PubMed ID: 19567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of tissue response to rotary and ultrasonic dental cutting procedures.
    HANSEN LS; NIELSEN AG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1956 Feb; 52(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 13286038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of deep dry cryogenic treatment on cutting efficiency and wear resistance of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
    Vinothkumar TS; Miglani R; Lakshminarayananan L
    J Endod; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1355-8. PubMed ID: 17963963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars.
    Silva LA; Leonardo MR; Nelson-Filho P; Tanomaru JM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 15272656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals.
    Suter B; Lussi A; Sequeira P
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 15667633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
    Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study.
    Ward JR; Parashos P; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2003 Nov; 29(11):756-63. PubMed ID: 14651285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Questionnaire survey on the use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments by Australian dentists.
    Parashos P; Messer HH
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 15056351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
    J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of cyclic fatigue between used and new Mtwo Ni-Ti rotary instruments.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Sorci E; Malagnino VA; Somma F
    Int Endod J; 2006 Sep; 39(9):716-23. PubMed ID: 16916361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study.
    Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usage parameters of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a survey of endodontists in the United States.
    Bird DC; Chambers D; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1193-7. PubMed ID: 19720215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of LightSpeed LS1 and LightSpeed LSX NiTi rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in simulated root canals.
    Iqbal MK; Banfield B; Lavorini A; Bachstein B
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 17320711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.