367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1355462)
1. Supreme Court rulings in two cases broaden legal protections for mentally ill criminal defendants.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1992 Jul; 43(7):752-3. PubMed ID: 1355462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Decoding right to refuse treatment law.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1993; 16(1-2):151-77. PubMed ID: 8099069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
Klein DW
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Problems in implementing the 1991 Treatment of Mental Patients Law in Israel.
Mester R; Mendel A; Gonen N; Becker D; Adlesberg S
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1995; 32(2):102-7; discussion 108. PubMed ID: 7558754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Judges confirm the fundamental right to physical integrity].
Weber M
Pflege Z; 2012 Oct; 65(10):626-8. PubMed ID: 23098036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court and the mentally disabled criminal defendant: recent developments.
Perlin ML
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(4):391-409. PubMed ID: 3427241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The involuntary medication of Jared Loughner and pretrial jail detainees in nonmedical correctional facilities.
Felthous AR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 22396347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and genuine confusion: legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Hofstra Law Rev; 1983; 12(1):77-120. PubMed ID: 15739272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication.
Goff ML
Indiana Law J; 2001; 76(4):983-1000. PubMed ID: 12455521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mental health advance directives: having one's say?
Dunlap JA
KY Law J; 2000; 89(2):327-86. PubMed ID: 12737165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity": Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):475-81. PubMed ID: 20947166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Competency to consent to voluntary hospitalization: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of Zinermon v. Burch.
Winick BJ
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1991; 14(3):169-214. PubMed ID: 1864687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rights of the patient vs. rights of the public in the "Treatment of the Mentally Ill Law--1991".
Bazak J
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1995; 32(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 7558765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partial insanity: when the judiciary and the psychiatric world collide.
Altmark D; Sigal M; Gelkopf M
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1995; 32(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 7558755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal "rites": criminalizing the mentally ill.
Treffert DA
Hillside J Clin Psychiatry; 1981; 3(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 7052934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Compliance with psychiatric legal ordinance section 63 STGB. Legal principles--current status--treatment concepts--perspectives].
Nedopil N; Müller-Isberner R
Nervenarzt; 1995 Nov; 66(11):793-801. PubMed ID: 8532095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to refuse treatment under Rogers v. Commissioner: preliminary empirical findings and comparisons.
Hoge SK; Gutheil TG; Kaplan E
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 2893647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
