These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13575725)

  • 21. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contralateral masking and the SISI-test in normal listeners.
    Blegvad B; Terkildsen K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1967 Jun; 63(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 6037904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Musical pitch discrimination by cochlear implant users.
    Ping L; Yuan M; Feng H
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2012 May; 121(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22724279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A procedure for the early detection of noise-susceptible individuals.
    Michael PL; Bienvenue GR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Jan; 37(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 1246949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relating binaural pitch perception to the individual listener's auditory profile.
    Santurette S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2968-86. PubMed ID: 22501074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A practical method for determination of the frequency discrimination threshold].
    Giaccai F; Cappellini F; Ricci T
    Boll Mal Orecch Gola Naso; 1970; 88(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 5515423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Psychophysics of 12 channels implant.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Drira M; Alcaras N
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():105-10. PubMed ID: 6596832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [On a new test of frequency discrimination in a free field].
    Madonia T; Lentini G; Raso D
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1968; 20(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 5746208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tone pitch intelligibility, hearing adaptation and fatigue.
    Laskiewicz A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1968; 65(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 5657105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Handedness and dichotic listening to nonverbal features of speech.
    Nachshon I
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Dec; 47(3 Pt 2):1111-4. PubMed ID: 745882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Discrimination performance of high school sophomores on a battery of auditory tests.
    Elliott DN; Riach WD; Sheposh JP; Trahiotis C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1966; ():Suppl 216:1-59. PubMed ID: 5935910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB)--a procedure for the assessment of loudness.
    Allen JB; Hall JL; Jeng PS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):745-53. PubMed ID: 2212299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A FACTOR ANALYTIC STUDY OF THREE SIGNAL DETECTION ABILITIES.
    HARRIS JD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1964 Mar; 7():71-8. PubMed ID: 14130745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Experimental contribution to vowel discrimination in frequency transposition of the formants].
    Schlöndorff G; Tegtmeier W
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1969 Dec; 194(2):466-9. PubMed ID: 5372623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Changes of the frequency discrimination threshold in presence of a continuous controlateral sound].
    Madonia T; Lentini G; Raso D
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1968; 20(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 5746205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Absolute pitch: a special group of ears.
    Drayna DT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Sep; 104(37):14549-50. PubMed ID: 17846431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EFFECT OF COCHLEAR LESIONS UPON AUDIOGRAMS AND INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION IN CATS.
    ELLIOTT DN; MCGEE TM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1965 Jun; 74():386-408. PubMed ID: 14325853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Considerations on the threshold of timbre discrimination in normal subjects].
    Madonia T; Lentini G
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971; 92(3):105-13. PubMed ID: 5565274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impaired perception of harmonic complexity in congenital amusia: a case study.
    Reed CL; Cahn SJ; Cory C; Szaflarski JP
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2011 Jul; 28(5):305-21. PubMed ID: 22248246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.