These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13576506)

  • 1. Listener responses to non-fluencies.
    BOEHMLER RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1958 Jun; 1(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 13576506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listener evaluations of speech interruptions.
    WILLIAMS DE; KENT LR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1958 Jun; 1(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 13576505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of listener sophistication upon global ratings of speech behavior.
    BURGI EJ; MATTHEWS J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1960 Dec; 3():348-53. PubMed ID: 13689029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Articulation test measures and listener ratings of articulation defectiveness.
    JORDAN EP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1960 Dec; 3():303-19. PubMed ID: 13790673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Listener adaptation to the severity of stuttering.
    TROTTER WD; KOOLS JA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1955 Dec; 20(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 13272235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of clear speech on auditory-perceptual judgments of electrolaryngeal speech.
    Cox SR; Doyle PC
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 75():25-36. PubMed ID: 30005317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The patient as listener: a new dimension in the structure of psychotherapy.
    GEOCARIS K
    AMA Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1960 Jan; 2():81-8. PubMed ID: 13827341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Role of the listener in the formation of language sounds].
    DURAND M
    J Psychol Norm Pathol (Paris); 1955; 52(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 13286760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An electromyographic study of listening and talking.
    SMITH AA; MALMO RB; SHAGASS C
    Can J Psychol; 1954 Dec; 8(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 13219618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protocol for evaluation of the effect of hearing aid electroacoustic parameters on perception of amplified speech.
    Lawrence DW; Blackledge VO
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(6):197-201. PubMed ID: 893188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MISARTICULATIONS AND LISTENER JUDGMENTS OF THE SPEECH OF INDIVIDULS WITH CLEFT PALATES.
    VANDEMARK DR
    Cleft Palate J; 1964 Apr; 12():232-45. PubMed ID: 14140820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of learning rate, recall and listener confidence ratings to assess effects of acoustically distorted speech stimuli.
    Gilbert HR; Saxman JH
    Lang Speech; 1974; 17(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 4459626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between speech rate perceived and produced by the listener.
    Schwab S
    Phonetica; 2011; 68(4):243-55. PubMed ID: 22286166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What information enables a listener to map a talker's vowel space?
    Verbrugge RR; Strange W; Shankweiler DP; Edman TR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Jul; 60(1):198-21. PubMed ID: 956527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intelligibility and listener preference of telephone speech in the presence of babble noise.
    Hall JL; Flanagan JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 20058974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric asymmetry in the hierarchical perception of music and speech.
    Rosenthal MA
    Psychol Bull; 2016 Nov; 142(11):1165-1178. PubMed ID: 27559748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory psychophysics and perception.
    Hirsh IJ; Watson CS
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1996; 47():461-84. PubMed ID: 8624140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SPEAKERS' AND LISTENERS' PROCESSES IN A WORD-COMMUNICATION TASK.
    ROSENBERG S; COHEN BD
    Science; 1964 Sep; 145(3637):1201-3. PubMed ID: 14173413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory skills and brain morphology predict individual differences in adaptation to degraded speech.
    Erb J; Henry MJ; Eisner F; Obleser J
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2154-64. PubMed ID: 22609577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.