These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13582368)

  • 1. A comparison of monaural and binaural hearing aids for listening to speech.
    HEDGECOCK LD; SHEETS BV
    AMA Arch Otolaryngol; 1958 Nov; 68(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 13582368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nabelek AK; Pickett JM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Dec; 17(4):724-39. PubMed ID: 4444292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Late-onset auditory deprivation: effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids.
    Silman S; Gelfand SA; Silverman CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1357-62. PubMed ID: 6512097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of speech perception between monaural and binaural hearing in cochlear implant patients.
    Iwaki T; Matsushiro N; Mah SR; Sato T; Yasuoka E; Yamamoto K; Kubo T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15224853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural application of the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Snik AF; Beynon AJ; Mylanus EA; van der Pouw CT; Cremers CW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1998 Mar; 107(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 9525238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reactions to binaural hearing aid fitting.
    Markides A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():197-205. PubMed ID: 6955926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids.
    Nábĕlek AK; Pickett JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Aug; 56(2):628-39. PubMed ID: 4415491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forms of binaural summation and the implications of individual variability for binaural hearing aids.
    Haggard MP; Hall JW
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():47-63. PubMed ID: 6287568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of listening devices to ameliorate auditory deficit in children with autism.
    Rance G; Saunders K; Carew P; Johansson M; Tan J
    J Pediatr; 2014 Feb; 164(2):352-7. PubMed ID: 24183205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort.
    Feuerstein JF
    Ear Hear; 1992 Apr; 13(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 1601196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MONAURAL AND BINAURAL SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY AND THE STEREOPHONIC EFFECT BASED UPON TEMPORAL CUES.
    HARRIS JD
    Laryngoscope; 1965 Mar; 75():428-46. PubMed ID: 14265973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory processing disorders and problems with hearing-aid fitting in old age.
    Antonelli AR
    Audiology; 1978; 17(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 623552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of a directional microphone array for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):799-808. PubMed ID: 8370886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficiency of binaural listening among the hearing-impaired.
    WRIGHT HN; CARHART R
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1960 Dec; 72():789-97. PubMed ID: 13786784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies I: Instrumental Evaluation.
    Baumgärtel RM; Krawczyk-Becker M; Marquardt D; Völker C; Hu H; Herzke T; Coleman G; Adiloğlu K; Ernst SM; Gerkmann T; Doclo S; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Directional audiometry. V. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in patients with monaural hearing loss treated with hearing aids (CROS).
    Tonning FM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972; 74(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 5068758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some aspects of auditory space, speech perception and the use of hearing aids.
    Martin MC; Stevenson PW; Grover BC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):141-61. PubMed ID: 292140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural masking release in children with Down syndrome.
    Porter HL; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Tharpe AM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):e134-42. PubMed ID: 24535557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.