These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1358700)

  • 1. Assessment of fetal well-being: fetal movement count versus non stress test.
    Wilailak S; Suthutvoravut S; Cherng-sa-ad P; Herabutya Y; Chaturachinda K
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1992 Sep; 39(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 1358700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fetal acoustic stimulation test: a reliable and cost effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring.
    Batcha TM; Goonewardene IM
    Ceylon Med J; 2005 Dec; 50(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 16538910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maternal perception of sound provoked fetal movement for antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Chittacharoen A; Herabutya Y; Tungsagonwattana S; Suthutvoravut S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Dec; 23(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 9433045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing.
    Chutiwongse S; Tannirandorn Y; Sukcharoen N; Witoonpanich P; Snidvongs W; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?
    Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal vibro-acoustic stimulation with a can--a clinical study.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Lawrie TA; de Jager M; da Ponte A
    S Afr Med J; 1998 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):199-200, 203. PubMed ID: 9542487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antenatal fetal health.
    Arulkumaran S; Anandakumar C; Wong YC; Ratnam SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 2911425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective comparison of the startle test (recoil) and non-stress test.
    Gabert HA; Miller JM
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):159-61. PubMed ID: 11444782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal acoustic stimulation test for early intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Goonewardene M; Hanwellage K
    Ceylon Med J; 2011 Mar; 56(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 21542428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The startle test revisited.
    Miller JM; Rodriguez A; Gabert HA
    J Perinatol; 2004 Jul; 24(7):421-2. PubMed ID: 15152272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive value of antepartum fetal heart rate non-stress test in high-risk pregnancy.
    Lenstrup C; Haase N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1985; 64(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 3984690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement in the early intrapartum period.
    Chittacharoen A; Srijhantuik K; Suthutvoravut S; Herabutya Y
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Feb; 56(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 9061386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proposed management for reduced fetal movements: five years' experience in one medical center.
    Skornick-Rapaport A; Maslovitz S; Kupferminc M; Lessing JB; Many A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Apr; 24(4):610-3. PubMed ID: 20828236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coupling of fetal movement and fetal heart rate accelerations as an indicator of fetal health.
    Baser I; Johnson TR; Paine LL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 80(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 1603499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doppler and B-mode ultrasonography in biophysical profile scoring.
    Sener T; Ozalp S; Hassa H; Yildirim A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1996 Sep; 54(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8889630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The correlation in antepartum fetal test between full fetal biophysical profile (FBP) and rapid biophysical profile (rBPP).
    Phattanachindakun B; Boonyagulsrirung T; Chanprapaph P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jul; 93(7):759-64. PubMed ID: 20649052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maternal position during non-stress test and fetal heart rate patterns.
    Cito G; Luisi S; Mezzesimi A; Cavicchioli C; Calonaci G; Petraglia F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):335-8. PubMed ID: 15762962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective evaluation of the contraction stress and nonstress tests in the management of post-term pregnancy.
    Druzin ML; Karver ML; Wagner W; Hutson JM; Waltner A; Kogut E
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Jun; 174(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 1595028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized controlled trial of a new fetal acoustic stimulation test for fetal well-being.
    Marden D; McDuffie RS; Allen R; Abitz D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1386-8. PubMed ID: 9215204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.