773 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1359641)
1. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors.
Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Sudar D; Rutovitz D; Gray JW; Waldman F; Pinkel D
Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5083):818-21. PubMed ID: 1359641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of amplified DNA sequences by reverse chromosome painting using genomic tumor DNA as probe.
Joos S; Scherthan H; Speicher MR; Schlegel J; Cremer T; Lichter P
Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 8383093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Detection of DNA amplifications and deletions in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)].
Matsumura K
Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Dec; 62(4):513-31. PubMed ID: 8583163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors.
Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Piper J; Isola J; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1994 Aug; 10(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 7522536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded solid tumors by comparative genomic hybridization after universal DNA-amplification.
Speicher MR; du Manoir S; Schröck E; Holtgreve-Grez H; Schoell B; Lengauer C; Cremer T; Ried T
Hum Mol Genet; 1993 Nov; 2(11):1907-14. PubMed ID: 8281155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization.
Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Piper J; Tanner M; Stokke T; Chen L; Smith HS; Pinkel D; Gray JW; Waldman FM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1994 Mar; 91(6):2156-60. PubMed ID: 8134364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative genomic hybridization: a rapid new method for detecting and mapping DNA amplification in tumors.
Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Sudar D; Rutovitz D; Gray JW; Waldman F; Pinkel D
Semin Cancer Biol; 1993 Feb; 4(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 8448377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detailed genomic mapping and expression analyses of 12p amplifications in pancreatic carcinomas reveal a 3.5-Mb target region for amplification.
Heidenblad M; Jonson T; Mahlamäki EH; Gorunova L; Karhu R; Johansson B; Höglund M
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2002 Jun; 34(2):211-23. PubMed ID: 11979555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative genomic hybridization(CGH)].
Matsuta M; Nishiya I
Hum Cell; 1993 Sep; 6(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8297821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
Rao PH
Methods Mol Med; 2005; 113():71-83. PubMed ID: 15968096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of gains and losses of DNA sequences in primary bladder cancer by comparative genomic hybridization.
Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Citro G; Sauter G; DeVries S; Kerschmann R; Caroll P; Waldman F
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1995 Mar; 12(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 7536461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Array CGH identifies distinct DNA copy number profiles of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in chromosomal- and microsatellite-unstable sporadic colorectal carcinomas.
Lassmann S; Weis R; Makowiec F; Roth J; Danciu M; Hopt U; Werner M
J Mol Med (Berl); 2007 Mar; 85(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 17143621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-resolution mapping of amplifications and deletions in pediatric osteosarcoma by use of CGH analysis of cDNA microarrays.
Squire JA; Pei J; Marrano P; Beheshti B; Bayani J; Lim G; Moldovan L; Zielenska M
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Nov; 38(3):215-25. PubMed ID: 14506695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Genetic screening of head-neck carcinomas using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)].
Bockmühl U; Petersen I; Schwendel A; Dietel M
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jul; 75(7):408-14. PubMed ID: 8924169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of a simplified comparative genomic hybridization technique to screen for gene amplification in pediatric solid tumors.
Bayani J; Thorner P; Zielenska M; Pandita A; Beatty B; Squire JA
Pediatr Pathol Lab Med; 1995; 15(6):831-44. PubMed ID: 8705194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hidden gene amplifications in aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas detected by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Wessendorf S; Schwaenen C; Kohlhammer H; Kienle D; Wrobel G; Barth TF; Nessling M; Möller P; Döhner H; Lichter P; Bentz M
Oncogene; 2003 Mar; 22(9):1425-9. PubMed ID: 12618769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of oncogene amplifications in medulloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Tong CY; Hui AB; Yin XL; Pang JC; Zhu XL; Poon WS; Ng HK
J Neurosurg; 2004 Feb; 100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):187-93. PubMed ID: 14758948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization.
Larramendy ML; El-Rifai W; Knuutila S
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 9515716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
