116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1360048)
1. Mercy without certainty.
Puxon M
Lancet; 1992 Nov; 340(8831):1343. PubMed ID: 1360048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Withdrawing medical treatment: implications of the Bland case.
Tribe D; Korgaonkar G
Br J Hosp Med; 1992 Dec 2-1993 Jan 5; 48(11):754-6. PubMed ID: 1467821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The case of Mr. Stevens.
Cranford RE
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 1938335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-renewal of life support for PVS.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1994 Jan; 343(8892):286-7. PubMed ID: 7905106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Getting down to cases.
Scofield GR
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):213-26. PubMed ID: 1938336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Concerning the case of "Mr. Stevens.".
Davis JJ
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 1938337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What actually happened: an informed review of the Linares incident.
Goldman GM; Stratton KM; Brown MD
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 2628644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In re Smerdon.
Kraayeveld J
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 1765455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Neurologic syndromes and prolonged survival: when can artificial nutrition and hydration be forgone?
Cranford RE
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):13-22. PubMed ID: 1910128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurses seek a voice in right-to-die cases.
Am J Nurs; 1991 Mar; 91(3):26. PubMed ID: 1900146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical problems in the withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from two patients in a persistent vegetative state.
Richardson JP; Keay TJ
Arch Fam Med; 1993 Sep; 2(9):981-6. PubMed ID: 8111529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal and ethical aspects of feeding.
Lennard-Jones J
Nurs Times; 2000 Apr; 96(17 Suppl):7. PubMed ID: 11962301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective.
Ackerman JW; Pope MC
J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Decision-making and the right to refuse lifesaving treatment for defective newborns.
Shatten DA; Chabon RS
J Leg Med; 1982 Mar; 3(1):59-79. PubMed ID: 6979600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Withholding of life-saving treatment.
Lancet; 1990 Nov; 336(8723):1121. PubMed ID: 1977993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Food and water can be withheld from dying patients: the very different situations of Claire Conroy and Karen Quinlan.
Lynn J
Death Educ; 1984; 8(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10310838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
Crossley MA
Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Donald McCarthy.
Harburg M
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 7960666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Substituted judgment, best interests, and the need for best respect.
Martyn SR
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 8049767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The permanently unconscious patient, non-feeding and euthanasia.
Cantor NL
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):381-437. PubMed ID: 2517381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
