BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1361147)

  • 1. Safety warnings and first aid instructions on consumer and pharmaceutical products in Nigeria: are they adequate?
    Orisakwe OE
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1992 Nov; 11(6):546-8. PubMed ID: 1361147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety warnings and first aid instructions on consumer and pharmaceutical products in Nigeria: has there been an improvement?
    Nonyelum SC; Nkem N; Ifeyinwa CN; Orisakwe OE
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2010 Oct; 60(10):801-4. PubMed ID: 21381605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How adequate are warnings and first and instructions on consumer product labels?: an investigation.
    Alderman D; Burke M; Cohen B; Di Marco AD; Fiet S; Hertzberg L; Sandor P
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1982 Feb; 24(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 7058630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An extensive review of commercial product labels the good, bad and ugly.
    Mrvos R; Dean BS; Krenzelok EP
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1986 Feb; 28(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 3705434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Labelling of household products and prevention of unintentional poisoning.
    de Presgrave RF; Alves EN; Camacho LA; Bôas MH
    Cien Saude Colet; 2008 Apr; 13 Suppl():683-8. PubMed ID: 21936172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inconsistencies in emergency instructions on common household product labels.
    Cantrell FL; Nordt SP; Krauss JR
    J Community Health; 2013 Oct; 38(5):823-8. PubMed ID: 23584666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of household product labels in Turkey.
    Lermioglu F; Sozer S
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1997 Jun; 39(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 9167252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using federal standards to determine adequacy of consumer product's precautionary labeling.
    Hurst R
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1986 Dec; 28(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 3788042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Poison prevention education.
    Temple AR
    Pediatrics; 1984 Nov; 74(5 Pt 2):964-9. PubMed ID: 6493901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An examination of consumer advisement warning information embedded within written instructions: implications for memory and behaviour.
    Fuller JK; Sulsky LM
    Ergonomics; 1995 Nov; 38(11):2238-49. PubMed ID: 7498186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of consumer uses of first aid recommendations on pesticide labels.
    O'Malley M; Alsop J; Esser TE
    Vet Hum Toxicol; 1989 Jun; 31(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 2741311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Progress in collaboration for consumer product safety and prevention of poisoning accidents from the stand point of the Japan Poison Information Center].
    Iizuka F; Kuroki Y; Yoshioka T
    Chudoku Kenkyu; 2009 Sep; 22(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 20095113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. History and evolution of warning labels for automotive friction products.
    Kopelovich LM; Thuett KA; Chapman PS; Paustenbach DJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 68(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 24518387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Safety Claims on Consumer Chemical Product Perceptions and the Role of Warnings.
    Kim S
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):451-469. PubMed ID: 35696728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehending product warning information: age-related effects and the roles of memory, inferencing, and knowledge.
    Hancock HE; Fisk AD; Rogers WA
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 16170935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Investigation of moth repellents exposure by JPIC inquiries--from the viewpoint of effective product label on prevention of accidental ingestion].
    Shimada Y
    Chudoku Kenkyu; 2004 Oct; 17(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 15678934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ratings checklist for warnings: a prototype tool to aid experts in the adequacy evaluation of proposed or existing warnings.
    Lenorovitz DR; Leonard SD; Karnes EW
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3616-23. PubMed ID: 22317272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low literacy impairs comprehension of prescription drug warning labels.
    Davis TC; Wolf MS; Bass PF; Middlebrooks M; Kennen E; Baker DW; Bennett CL; Durazo-Arvizu R; Bocchini A; Savory S; Parker RM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Aug; 21(8):847-51. PubMed ID: 16881945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumer perceptions of medication warnings about driving: a comparison of French and Australian labels.
    Smyth T; Sheehan M; Siskind V; Mercier-Guyon C; Mallaret M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 23859486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of wording in "Dear doctor" letters and in black box labels.
    Weatherby LB; Nordstrom BL; Fife D; Walker AM
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2002 Dec; 72(6):735-42. PubMed ID: 12496755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.