289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1362372)
1. Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians' attitudes and practice.
Stiell IG; McDowell I; Nair RC; Aeta H; Greenberg G; McKnight RD; Ahuja J
CMAJ; 1992 Dec; 147(11):1671-8. PubMed ID: 1362372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of radiography in acute knee injuries: need for clinical decision rules.
Stiell IG; Wells GA; McDowell I; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Cwinn AA; Quinn JV; Yeats A
Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Nov; 2(11):966-73. PubMed ID: 8536122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.
Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM
CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.
Stiell IG; McKnight RD; Greenberg GH; McDowell I; Nair RC; Wells GA; Johns C; Worthington JR
JAMA; 1994 Mar; 271(11):827-32. PubMed ID: 8114236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contribution of individual projections alone and in combination for radiographic detection of ankle fractures.
Brandser EA; Berbaum KS; Dorfman DD; Braksiek RJ; El-Khoury GY; Saltzman CL; Marsh JL; Clark WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1691-7. PubMed ID: 10845508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical application of the Ottawa ankle rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: an independent site assessment.
Verma S; Hamilton K; Hawkins HH; Kothari R; Singal B; Buncher R; Nguyen P; O'Neill M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):825-7. PubMed ID: 9275906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenging fractures of the foot and ankle.
Prokuski LJ; Saltzman CL
Radiol Clin North Am; 1997 May; 35(3):655-70. PubMed ID: 9167667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J
JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimising negative ankle and foot X-rays in the Emergency Department -- are the Ottawa ankle rules good enough?
Crosswell S; Leaman A; Phung W
Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2002-4. PubMed ID: 25257400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of triage-based use of the Ottawa foot and ankle rules on the number of orders for radiographic imaging.
Ashurst JV; Nappe T; Digiambattista S; Kambhampati A; Alam S; Ortiz M; Delpais P; Porter BG; Kurt A; Kane BG; Greenberg MR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Dec; 114(12):890-7. PubMed ID: 25429079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.
Stiell I; Wells G; Laupacis A; Brison R; Verbeek R; Vandemheen K; Naylor CD
BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7005):594-7. PubMed ID: 7663253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children: a survey of physicians' practice patterns.
Dowling SK; Wishart I
CJEM; 2011 Sep; 13(5):333-8; E44-6. PubMed ID: 21955415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of ankle inversion injuries in family practice offices.
Smith GF; Madlon-Kay DJ; Hunt V
J Fam Pract; 1993 Oct; 37(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 8409887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Worthington JR
Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Apr; 21(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 1554175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Provider perceptions concerning use of chest x-ray studies in adult blunt trauma assessments.
Calderon G; Perez D; Fortman J; Kea B; Rodriguez RM
J Emerg Med; 2012 Oct; 43(4):568-74. PubMed ID: 22056110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.
Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT
Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules for the efficient utilization of radiographies in acute lesions of the ankle].
Aginaga Badiola JR; Ventura Huarte I; Tejera Torroja E; Huarte Sanz I; Cuende Garcés A; Gómez Garcerán M; Labaca Arteaga J
Aten Primaria; 1999 Sep; 24(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 10547910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiography in acute ankle injuries: the Ottawa Ankle Rules versus local diagnostic decision rules.
Pijnenburg AC; Glas AS; De Roos MA; Bogaard K; Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Butzelaar RM; Keeman JN
Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Jun; 39(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 12023701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ankle and foot injuries: analysis of MDCT findings.
Haapamaki VV; Kiuru MJ; Koskinen SK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 15333345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rule in a university sports medicine center.
Leddy JJ; Kesari A; Smolinski RJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Jan; 34(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 11782648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
