These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1362437)

  • 1. An efficient statistical procedure for interpreting DNA single locus profiling data in crime cases.
    Evett IW; Scranage JK; Pinchin R
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1992; 32(4):307-26. PubMed ID: 1362437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA single locus profiles: tests for the robustness of statistical procedures within the context of forensic science.
    Evett IW; Pinchin R
    Int J Legal Med; 1991; 104(5):267-72. PubMed ID: 1685892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taking account of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles.
    Evett IW; Gill PD; Lambert JA
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 9456527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA-profiling of stains in criminal cases: analysis of measurement errors and band-shift. Discussion of match criteria.
    Eriksen B; Svensmark O
    Forensic Sci Int; 1993 Sep; 61(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 7901133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian model of AFLP marker evolution and phylogenetic inference.
    Luo R; Hipp AL; Larget B
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article11. PubMed ID: 17474877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An illustration of the advantages of efficient statistical methods for RFLP analysis in forensic science.
    Evett IW; Scranage J; Pinchin R
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Mar; 52(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 8095367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Large scale database experiments to assess the significance of matching DNA profiles.
    Lambert JA; Scranage JK; Evett IW
    Int J Legal Med; 1995; 108(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 7495691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation into the performance of methods for adjusting for sampling uncertainty in DNA likelihood ratio calculations.
    Curran JM; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):512-6. PubMed ID: 21208838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical issues in DNA evidence.
    Brookfield JF
    Electrophoresis; 1995 Sep; 16(9):1665-9. PubMed ID: 8582353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing likelihood and Bayesian coalescent estimation of population parameters.
    Kuhner MK; Smith LP
    Genetics; 2007 Jan; 175(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 16510781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A discussion of the robustness of methods for assessing the evidential value of DNA single locus profiles in crime investigations.
    Evett IW; Gill P
    Electrophoresis; 1991; 12(2-3):226-30. PubMed ID: 2040269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond traditional paternity and identification cases. Selecting the most probable pedigree.
    Egeland T; Mostad PF; Mevâg B; Stenersen M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2000 May; 110(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 10802200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Match probability calculations for multi-locus DNA profiles.
    Donnelly P
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):55-67. PubMed ID: 7607460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DNA fingerprinting for forensic identification: some statistical issues.
    Majumder PP
    Electrophoresis; 1995 Sep; 16(9):1684-8. PubMed ID: 8582356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probability of a segregating pattern in a sample of DNA sequences.
    Fu YX
    Theor Popul Biol; 1998 Aug; 54(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9680485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical analysis of the measurement errors in the determination of fragment length in DNA-RFLP analysis.
    Eriksen B; Bertelsen A; Svensmark O
    Forensic Sci Int; 1992 Jan; 52(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 1351023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Likelihood ratio and posterior odds in forensic genetics: Two sides of the same coin.
    Caliebe A; Walsh S; Liu F; Kayser M; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():203-210. PubMed ID: 28314239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
    Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.