These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1362678)

  • 1. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
    Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
    Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
    Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
    Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
    Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The negative predictive value of clinical examination with or without anesthesia versus magnetic resonance imaging for parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer stages IB1 to IIA.
    Bleker SM; Bipat S; Spijkerboer AM; van der Velden J; Stoker J; Kenter GG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):193-8. PubMed ID: 23221736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomography in staging primary uterine cervical carcinoma.
    Poon PY
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6885893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
    Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical carcinoma and comparison with spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Yang WT; Walkden SB; Ho S; Cheung TH; Lam SK; Teo J; Metreweli C
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jul; 69(823):610-6. PubMed ID: 8696696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing disease extent in women with bulky or clinically evident metastatic cervical cancer: yield of pretreatment studies.
    Massad LS; Calvello C; Gilkey SH; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Mar; 76(3):383-7. PubMed ID: 10684715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
    Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT and ultra low field (0.02 T) MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma.
    Varpula M; Kilholma P; Klemi P
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8011386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.
    Subak LL; Hricak H; Powell CB; Azizi L; Stern JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7784021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Cervical Cancer: An Agreement Study.
    Arribas S; Alcázar JL; Arraiza M; Benito A; Minguez JA; Jurado M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):867-73. PubMed ID: 27022170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results.
    Oellinger JJ; Blohmer JU; Michniewicz K; Siewert C; Wust P; Gutberlet M; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 10721187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stage IB cervical carcinoma: comparison of clinical, MR, and pathologic staging.
    Rubens D; Thornbury JR; Angel C; Stoler MH; Weiss SL; Lerner RM; Beecham J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Jan; 150(1):135-8. PubMed ID: 3257111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement of two-dimensional and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer.
    Chiappa V; Di Legge A; Valentini AL; Gui B; Miccò M; Ludovisi M; Giansiracusa C; Testa AC; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 25091827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Uterine cervix cancers: staging by magnetic resonance imaging].
    Bartoli JM; Moulin G; Di Stefano-Louineau D; Gaubert JY; Delannoy L; Delpero JR; Blanc B; Kasbarian M
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(4-5):241-7. PubMed ID: 2268127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.