These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

37 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13631004)

  • 1. [Diagnostic value of the micro-calcifications in mammograms].
    MOULONGUET P; PICARD JD; GASNE L
    J Chir (Paris); 1959 Jan; 77(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 13631004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patterns and predictors of mammography utilization among breast cancer survivors.
    Doubeni CA; Field TS; Ulcickas Yood M; Rolnick SJ; Quessenberry CP; Fouayzi H; Gurwitz JH; Wei F
    Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2482-8. PubMed ID: 16634097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mammograms. Introduction].
    Gorins A
    Cah Coll Med Hop Paris; 1967; 8(9):717. PubMed ID: 5619593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resource use and cost of diagnostic workup of women with suspected breast cancer.
    Lee DW; Stang PE; Goldberg GA; Haberman M
    Breast J; 2009; 15(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 19120378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age no bar to routine mammography. Evidence is accumulating that women in their 70s and beyond can benefit from regular mammograms. What does that mean for you?
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2008 Jul; 15(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 18819197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Casting-type calcifications on the mammogram suggest a higher probability of early relapse and death among high-risk breast cancer patients.
    Pálka I; Ormándi K; Gaál S; Boda K; Kahán Z
    Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(8):1178-83. PubMed ID: 17851833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer.
    Bagley FH
    Arch Surg; 2004 Apr; 139(4):380-3; discussion 383. PubMed ID: 15078704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized analysis of tissue density effect on missed cancer detection in digital mammography.
    Li L; Wu Z; Salem A; Chen Z; Chen L; George F; Kallergi M; Berman C
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Jul; 30(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 16837164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of an organized, nationwide breast cancer screening programme on non-organized mammography activities.
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Pintér I; Battyány I; Ember I
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 18416949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography screening rates decline: a person-time approach to evaluation.
    Feldstein AC; Vogt TM; Aickin M; Hu WR
    Prev Med; 2006 Sep; 43(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 16675004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.
    Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J
    Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery.
    Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controversies in mammography.
    Timins JK
    N J Med; 2005; 102(1-2):45-9. PubMed ID: 15790065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Histological substratum of calcifications revealed by radiography in mammary cancer].
    GRICOUROFF G; CHAVANNE G; ROUSSEAU J
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1951 Apr; 145(7-8):558-9. PubMed ID: 14859588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Histopathologic significance of radiologically viewed calcifications in breast cancer].
    FLORENTIN P; ROUSSEL J; SCHOUMACHER P
    Rev Med Nancy; 1955 Dec; 80():987-92. PubMed ID: 13290470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.