These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13639245)

  • 1. A study of cases manifesting low voltage in the frontal plane electrocardiographic leads.
    WATTS RW; GURSAL K
    Circulation; 1959 Apr; 19(4):595-9. PubMed ID: 13639245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of left ventricular mass in systemic hypertension: comparison of standard and signal averaged electrocardiography.
    Lacroix D; Nader MA; Savoye C; Klug D; Logier R; Kacet S; Lekieffre J
    Br Heart J; 1995 Sep; 74(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 7547022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Relation of electrocardiographic features and distribution of hypertrophy in hypertrophic non-obstructive cardiomyopathy during childhood].
    Kamiya Y; Oonaka M; Itoi T; Hamaoka K; Onouchi Z
    J Cardiol; 1994; 24(2):91-106. PubMed ID: 8164151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further voltage augmentation by employing the geometric mid-point technique and a new frontal-plane electrocardiographic lead placement.
    Tse RL; Lee TY
    Angiology; 1973 Nov; 24(10):635-48. PubMed ID: 4761034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrocardiographic electrode misplacement, misconnection, and artifact.
    Harrigan RA; Chan TC; Brady WJ
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 43(6):1038-44. PubMed ID: 22929906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrocardiographic voltage in pericardial effusion.
    Unverferth DV; Williams TE; Fulkerson PK
    Chest; 1979 Feb; 75(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 421551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrocardiographic changes associated with insulin resistance.
    Granér M; Pentikäinen MO; Siren R; Nyman K; Lundbom J; Hakkarainen A; Lauerma K; Lundbom N; Nieminen MS; Taskinen MR
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2014 Mar; 24(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 24462049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrocardiographic axis deviation in Navajo and Apache indians.
    Ewy GA; Okada RD; Marcus FI; Goldberg SJ; Phibbs BP
    Chest; 1979 Jan; 75(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 421525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modified limb lead ECG system effects on electrocardiographic wave amplitudes and frontal plane axis in sinus rhythm subjects.
    Jayaraman S; Sangareddi V; Periyasamy R; Joseph J; Shanmugam RM
    Anatol J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 27443474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theoretic analysis of the influence of heart-dipole eccentricity on limb leads, Wilson central-terminal voltage and the frontal-plane vectocardiogram.
    FRANK E
    Circ Res; 1953 Sep; 1(5):380-8. PubMed ID: 13082678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic approach to the cardiac electrical field in the frontal plane.
    GRAETTINGER JS
    Trans Am Coll Cardiol; 1952; 2():182-8. PubMed ID: 13049512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimization of frontal-plane electrocardiographic lead data in the 30 degrees hexaxial system.
    Lee TY
    J Electrocardiol; 1973; 6(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 4691399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Massive pulmonary thromboembolism with left axis deviation and low voltage].
    Sánchez Díaz CJ; Ramírez Rivera A; González Carmona VM; García Castillo A
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1987; 57(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 2960286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The classical versus the Cabrera presentation system for resting electrocardiography: Impact on recognition and understanding of clinically important electrocardiographic changes.
    Lam A; Wagner GS; Pahlm O
    J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 26051487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple method to determine the electrocardiographic frontal plane axis.
    Hakki AH; Anderson GJ; Iskandrian AS; Segal BL
    J Electrocardiol; 1982; 15(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 7119639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Electrocardiographic differences between standard 12-lead recording and modifications in exercise testing].
    Marín JA; Roldán D
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1991; 61(6):593-6. PubMed ID: 1793312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The electrocardiogram in endomyocardial fibrosis].
    Tobias NM; Moffa PJ; Pastore CA; Barretto AC; Mady C; Arteaga E; Bellotti G; Pileggi F
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 59(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 1341179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid method to determine the electrocardiographic frontal plane axis.
    Meissner MD; Hakki AH; Iskandrian AS
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Apr; 65(13):949-50. PubMed ID: 2321551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrocardiographic observations in first three days after birth (with special reference to study of frontal plane P and QRS axis by hexaxial reference system).
    Grandhi VK; Damany SJ; Joshi CI
    Indian Pediatr; 1974 Jan; 11(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 4839582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ventricular arrhythmias. A guide to their localisation.
    Holt PM; Smallpeice C; Deverall PB; Yates AK; Curry PV
    Br Heart J; 1985 Apr; 53(4):417-30. PubMed ID: 3986056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.