BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 136404)

  • 1. [Clinical evaluation of cardiovascular reactions to renal contrast media using an impedance method (author's transl)].
    Brutschin P; Vock P; Fuchs WA
    Rofo; 1976 Oct; 125(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 136404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intravenous vs. left ventricular injection of ionic contrast material: hemodynamic implications for digital subtraction angiography.
    Mancini GB; Ostrander DR; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Mar; 140(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 6337461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-medium-induced electrocardiographic abnormalities: comparison of bolus and infusion of methylglucamine iodamide and methylglucamine/sodium diatrizoate.
    Pfister RC; Hutter AM; Newhouse JH; Yoder IC; Travers E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jan; 140(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 6600306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Blood circulation reactions following injection of x-ray contrast media].
    Maurer HJ; Hahn N
    Z Kreislaufforsch; 1967 Oct; 56(10):993-1002. PubMed ID: 5592254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
    Buyan N; Arab M; Hasanoğlu E; Gökçora N; Ercan S
    Turk J Pediatr; 1995; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of contrast media on pulmonary hemodynamics: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
    Peck WW; Slutsky RA; Hackney DB; Mancini GB; Higgins CB
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 6622678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the cardiovascular responses to carotid injections of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Morris TW; Francis M; Fischer HW
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 468493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Asymptomatic blood pressure and pulse rate changes during intravenous urography. Ionic contrast media vs. nonionic contrast media].
    Miwa K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1082-6. PubMed ID: 2247349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Hemodynamic effects of contrast media. I. Response in normal subjects].
    Chioin R; Scognamiglio R; Stritoni P; Razzolini R; Congedo E; Corbara F; Boffa GM; Fusaro A
    G Clin Med; 1980 Oct; 61(10):759-68. PubMed ID: 7239051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Hemodynamic effects of contrast media. II. Response in patients with coronary disease].
    Scognamiglio R; Chioin R; Razzolini R; Stritoni P; Daliento L; Ramondo A; Dalla Volta S; Fusaro A
    G Clin Med; 1980 Oct; 61(10):769-75. PubMed ID: 7239052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Study of immunological parameters in radiography and excretory urography].
    Vaganov NV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1997; (2):36-8. PubMed ID: 9157666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bronchospasm during excretory urography: lack of specificity for the methylglucamine cation.
    Littner MR; Ulreich S; Putman CE; Rosenfield AT; Meadows G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Sep; 137(3):477-81. PubMed ID: 6974458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sodium salts or methylglucamine salts in contrast media for infusion pyelography? (author's transl)].
    Taenzer V; Albrecht A; Clauss W; Held I
    Radiologe; 1981 Jun; 21(6):288-90. PubMed ID: 7022552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Activation of the compliment system in incidents caused by contrast media injection].
    Till G; Rother U; Gemsa D; Gerhardt P
    Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1977 Apr 17-21; 83():1589-91. PubMed ID: 347789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemodynamic changes after administration of mannitol measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor.
    Sabharwal N; Rao GS; Ali Z; Radhakrishnan M
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Jul; 21(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 19543004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Sodium or methyl glucamine salts as contrast media for urography (author's transl)].
    Taenzer V; Clauss W; Simon I
    Rofo; 1980 Jul; 133(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 6451536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications.
    Gardeur D; Lautrou J; Millard JC; Berger N; Metzger J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systemic response to excretory urography. Work in progress.
    Fischer HW; Katzberg RW; Morris TW; Spataro RF
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 6701329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of renal function before and after intravenous injection of uroangiographic water soluble contrast media in men.
    Verbaeys A; Lameire N; Oosterlinck W
    Acta Urol Belg; 1989; 57(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 2631582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of metrizamide in coronary arteriography.
    Ludwig JW
    Diagn Imaging; 1979; 48(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 498916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.