These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 136404)

  • 1. [Clinical evaluation of cardiovascular reactions to renal contrast media using an impedance method (author's transl)].
    Brutschin P; Vock P; Fuchs WA
    Rofo; 1976 Oct; 125(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 136404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intravenous vs. left ventricular injection of ionic contrast material: hemodynamic implications for digital subtraction angiography.
    Mancini GB; Ostrander DR; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Mar; 140(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 6337461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-medium-induced electrocardiographic abnormalities: comparison of bolus and infusion of methylglucamine iodamide and methylglucamine/sodium diatrizoate.
    Pfister RC; Hutter AM; Newhouse JH; Yoder IC; Travers E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jan; 140(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 6600306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Blood circulation reactions following injection of x-ray contrast media].
    Maurer HJ; Hahn N
    Z Kreislaufforsch; 1967 Oct; 56(10):993-1002. PubMed ID: 5592254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
    Buyan N; Arab M; Hasanoğlu E; Gökçora N; Ercan S
    Turk J Pediatr; 1995; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of contrast media on pulmonary hemodynamics: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
    Peck WW; Slutsky RA; Hackney DB; Mancini GB; Higgins CB
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 6622678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the cardiovascular responses to carotid injections of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Morris TW; Francis M; Fischer HW
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 468493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Asymptomatic blood pressure and pulse rate changes during intravenous urography. Ionic contrast media vs. nonionic contrast media].
    Miwa K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1082-6. PubMed ID: 2247349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Hemodynamic effects of contrast media. I. Response in normal subjects].
    Chioin R; Scognamiglio R; Stritoni P; Razzolini R; Congedo E; Corbara F; Boffa GM; Fusaro A
    G Clin Med; 1980 Oct; 61(10):759-68. PubMed ID: 7239051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Hemodynamic effects of contrast media. II. Response in patients with coronary disease].
    Scognamiglio R; Chioin R; Razzolini R; Stritoni P; Daliento L; Ramondo A; Dalla Volta S; Fusaro A
    G Clin Med; 1980 Oct; 61(10):769-75. PubMed ID: 7239052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Study of immunological parameters in radiography and excretory urography].
    Vaganov NV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1997; (2):36-8. PubMed ID: 9157666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bronchospasm during excretory urography: lack of specificity for the methylglucamine cation.
    Littner MR; Ulreich S; Putman CE; Rosenfield AT; Meadows G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Sep; 137(3):477-81. PubMed ID: 6974458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sodium salts or methylglucamine salts in contrast media for infusion pyelography? (author's transl)].
    Taenzer V; Albrecht A; Clauss W; Held I
    Radiologe; 1981 Jun; 21(6):288-90. PubMed ID: 7022552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Activation of the compliment system in incidents caused by contrast media injection].
    Till G; Rother U; Gemsa D; Gerhardt P
    Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1977 Apr 17-21; 83():1589-91. PubMed ID: 347789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemodynamic changes after administration of mannitol measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor.
    Sabharwal N; Rao GS; Ali Z; Radhakrishnan M
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Jul; 21(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 19543004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Sodium or methyl glucamine salts as contrast media for urography (author's transl)].
    Taenzer V; Clauss W; Simon I
    Rofo; 1980 Jul; 133(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 6451536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications.
    Gardeur D; Lautrou J; Millard JC; Berger N; Metzger J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systemic response to excretory urography. Work in progress.
    Fischer HW; Katzberg RW; Morris TW; Spataro RF
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 6701329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of renal function before and after intravenous injection of uroangiographic water soluble contrast media in men.
    Verbaeys A; Lameire N; Oosterlinck W
    Acta Urol Belg; 1989; 57(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 2631582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of metrizamide in coronary arteriography.
    Ludwig JW
    Diagn Imaging; 1979; 48(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 498916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.