These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1364639)

  • 1. [Color processing of ultrasonographic images in extracorporeal lithotripsy].
    Lardennois B; Ziade A; Walter K
    Prog Urol; 1991 Feb; 1(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 1364639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image based renal stone tracking to improve efficacy in extracorporeal lithotripsy.
    Orkisz M; Farchtchian T; Saighi D; Bourlion M; Thiounn N; Gimenez G; Debré B; Flam TA
    J Urol; 1998 Oct; 160(4):1237-40. PubMed ID: 9751326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro study of ultrasound based real-time tracking of renal stones for shock wave lithotripsy: part 1.
    Chang CC; Liang SM; Pu YR; Chen CH; Manousakas I; Chen TS; Kuo CL; Yu FM; Chu ZF
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11435816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Color flow Doppler sonography for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Höbarth K; Maier A; Hofbauer J; Marberger M
    J Urol; 1993 Dec; 150(6):1768-70. PubMed ID: 8230499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound image analysis for renal stone tracking during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Manousakas I; Pu YR; Chang CC; Liang SM
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2746-9. PubMed ID: 17945734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A passive acoustic device for real-time monitoring of the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy treatment.
    Leighton TG; Fedele F; Coleman AJ; McCarthy C; Ryves S; Hurrell AM; De Stefano A; White PR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1651-65. PubMed ID: 18562085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomography of kidney stones for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Rodríguez AO; Cadena M; Azpiroz J; Gutiérrez J; Bustos J; Castaño E; Loske AM
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2774-5. PubMed ID: 17946980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of an ultrasound-guided ESWL unit.
    Karlin G; Marino C; Badlani G; Smith AD
    Arch Esp Urol; 1990 Jun; 43(5):579-81. PubMed ID: 2202266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical experiences of renal and upper ureter stone by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). II: 3-month follow-up of cases treated with ESWL].
    Kato S; Tanda H; Ohnishi S; Saka T; Nakajima H
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1985 Aug; 31(8):1317-20. PubMed ID: 4083195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digitization and postprocessing of plain-film radiographs for assessment of stone fragmentation after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
    Katzenwadel A; Popken G; Buitrago-Téllez CH; Schultze-Seemann W; Langer M; Sommerkamp H
    J Endourol; 1995 Dec; 9(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 8775069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones--a multivariate analysis model.
    Abdel-Khalek M; Sheir KZ; Mokhtar AA; Eraky I; Kenawy M; Bazeed M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 15204407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [New ultrasonic images in patients with lithiasis after undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].
    Ruiz Marcellán FJ; Cabré Fabré P; Gancedo Rodríguez V; Ibarz Servio L; Mauri Cunill A; Dalmau MR
    Arch Esp Urol; 1989 May; 42(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 2782965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanisms of differing stone fragility in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
    Zhong P; Preminger GM
    J Endourol; 1994 Aug; 8(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 7981735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limitations of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Madaan S; Joyce AD
    Curr Opin Urol; 2007 Mar; 17(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 17285020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: prevalence of renal stones 3-21 months after treatment.
    Miles SG; Kaude JV; Newman RC; Thomas WC; Williams CM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):307-9. PubMed ID: 3257315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Extracorporeal hydro-electric shockwave lithotripsy (Sonolith 2000). Analysis of 137 records of a first-year experience].
    Dore B; Grange PH; Aubert J
    Acta Urol Belg; 1989; 57(3):743-54. PubMed ID: 2683645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy monotherapy for large renal calculi: effect of stone and collecting system surface areas and cost-effectiveness of treatment.
    Murray MJ; Chandhoke PS; Berman CJ; Sankey NE
    J Endourol; 1995 Feb; 9(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 7780436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of the chemical nature of urinary calculi on the results of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy].
    Doré B; Grange P; Aubert J
    Ann Urol (Paris); 1990; 24(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 2181923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
    El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
    BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the pediatric ureter as efficient as the adult ureter in transporting fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi larger than 10 mm.?
    Gofrit ON; Pode D; Meretyk S; Katz G; Shapiro A; Golijanin D; Wiener DP; Shenfeld OZ; Landau EH
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1862-4. PubMed ID: 11586249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.