These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1365505)

  • 1. [Tolerance to various radiologic contrast agents used for coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction].
    Savchenko AP; Frolova MI; Smirnov AA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1991; (1):29-32. PubMed ID: 1365505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The tolerance to different x-ray contrast preparations used in coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction].
    Savchenko AP; Grolova MI; Smirnov AA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1991; (1):29-32. PubMed ID: 1887573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coronary angiography during acute myocardial infarction in dogs. A comparison of the hemodynamic effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Hwang MH; Gries W; Raymond RM; Scanlon PJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1988 Nov; 101(11):828-32. PubMed ID: 3150724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Myocardial infarction secondary to contrast agent. Contrast effect or type II Kounis syndrome?
    Kocabay G; Karabay CY; Kounis NG
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Jan; 30(1):255.e1-2. PubMed ID: 21159465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Electrocardiographic and hemodynamic adverse effects of contrast media in coronary angiography].
    Wagner J; Zwicker B
    Z Kardiol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 8165845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Acute myocardial infarction as a consequence of anaphylactic reaction after administration of urovision].
    Kwaśniewski A; Krasnowska M
    Kardiol Pol; 1990; 33(8):26-31. PubMed ID: 2074636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acute myocardial infarction in a patient with normal coronary arteries after an allergic reaction.
    Hamilos MI; Kochiadakis GE; Skalidis EI; Igoumenidis NE; Zaharaki A; Vardas PE
    Hellenic J Cardiol; 2005; 46(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 15807401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Tolerance to standard and non-ionic contrast media in patients with ischemic heart disease and stable angina pectoris during coronary angiography].
    Savchenko AP; Frolova MI; Smirnov AA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1992; (4):35-9. PubMed ID: 1345660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative study of triombrast and omnipaque tolerance in coronary angiography of patients with ischemic heart disease and stable angina pectoris].
    Savchenko AP; Frolova MI
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1993; (3):18-21. PubMed ID: 7618239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ionized calcium levels in coronary sinus blood during coronary angiography: effects of four contrast media.
    Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Torizuka T; Okuno Y; Monji T; Uwatoko H; Kitamura K; Abe M
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):159-61. PubMed ID: 1549664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A comparative assessment of the effect of Omnipaque and Verografin on ECG indices and myocardial contractility in patients with unstable angina during coronary ventriculography].
    Savchenko AP; Frolova MI; Zharov IN; Samko AN; Pomerantsev EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1989; (4):13-6. PubMed ID: 2815558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adverse reactions to contrast media: factors that determine the cost of treatment.
    Powe NR; Moore RD; Steinberg EP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):1089-95. PubMed ID: 8273616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coronary angiography during acute myocardial infarction in dogs: comparison of the hemodynamic effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Hwang MH; Gries W; Raymond RM; Scanlon PJ
    J Lab Clin Med; 1988 Sep; 112(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 3411193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allergic reactions to oral iodinated contrast agents: reactions to oral contrast.
    Ridley LJ
    Australas Radiol; 1998 May; 42(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 9599824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequencies of reactions to iohexol versus ioxaglate.
    Vacek JL; Gersema L; Woods M; Bower C; Beauchamp GD
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 66(17):1277-8. PubMed ID: 2239740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Coronary angiography in chronic and acute coronary artery disease. Advantages of a low osmolality contrast medium].
    Zipfel J; Baller D; Blanke H; Karsch KR; Wolpers HG; Hellige G; Rentrop P
    Z Kardiol; 1982 Sep; 71(9):576-80. PubMed ID: 7148075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin).
    Karle A; Fries J; Laulund S; Andrew E
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 3545629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.