These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1365505)
21. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol. Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Kieffer SA Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects. Higgins CB; Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Shaw D Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of contrast media on the RR and QT interval during coronary arteriography. Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Soga T; Maeda M; Torizuka T; Okuno Y; Misaki T; Dokoh S Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 2031794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Comparison of the tolerance of ionic and nonionic contrast media in coronary angiography]. Savchenko AP; Frolova MI; Pavlov NA Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1993; (6):21-4. PubMed ID: 7801591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ST elevation myocardial infarction presenting after use of pseudoephedrine. Celik A Cardiovasc Toxicol; 2009 Jun; 9(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 19381878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Significance of electrocardiographic abnormalities in the "lateral" leads in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction. Mongiardo R; Schiavoni G; Mazzari M; Ferri T; Santarelli P; Pennestri' F; Cece A; Gabrielli D; Manzoli U Cardiologia; 1988 Jul; 33(7):681-90. PubMed ID: 3203346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Reagan K; Bettman MA; Finkelstein J; Ganz P; Grassi CJ Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 3282261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Acute thrombocytopenia after i.v. administration of a radiographic contrast medium. Chang JC; Lee D; Gross HM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):947-9. PubMed ID: 2705351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Coronary arteriographic and left ventriculographic findings in acute myocardial infarction. Liau CS; Lee YT; Chen MF; Chen KS; Chen CC; Chen WJ; Sun SM; Lai CJ; Wu TL Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1987 Mar; 86(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 3598541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate. Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The frequency of hyperamylasemia after ERCP with diatrizoate and iohexol. Mäkelä P; Dean PB Eur J Radiol; 1986 Nov; 6(4):303-4. PubMed ID: 2431908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Coronary bypass without angiography: an unusual circumstance. Wright CB; Melvin DB; Flege JB; Long H; Millard R; Marcus M J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jun; 93(6):936-9. PubMed ID: 3494888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Electrocardiographic changes during coronary arteriography]. de Carvalho VB; Passaro LC; Décourt LV; Moffa PJ; Horta PE; de Oliveira SF; Favarato D; Martins JR; Galiano NE; Macruz R Arq Bras Cardiol; 1983 Aug; 41(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 6675603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of patient reactions and diagnostic quality for hysterosalpingography using ionic and nonionic contrast media. Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Fayez JA; Ott DJ; Van Swearingen FL Acad Radiol; 1995 Feb; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 9419535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Angiographic contrast agent-induced acute hemolysis in a patient with hemoglobin SC disease. Rao AK; Thompson R; Durlacher L; James F Arch Intern Med; 1985 Apr; 145(4):759-60. PubMed ID: 3985742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media versus iohexol. Wolf GL Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():166-70. PubMed ID: 6382932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Intolerance reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in cardiac diagnosis. A randomized double-blind study]. Machraoui A; Hinrichsen M; Jäger D; Lemke B; Drews S; Lange S; Barmeyer J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1991 Mar; 116(9):321-6. PubMed ID: 1997305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of sodium-meglumine ioxaglate and iopromide in coronary angiography. Neiss AC; Barth P; Chastin I; Erdmann E Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2662884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]