These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1365550)
41. Pecking preferences and pre-dispositions in domestic chicks: implications for the development of environmental enrichment devices. Jones RB; Carmichael NL; Rayner E Appl Anim Behav Sci; 2000 Oct; 69(4):291-312. PubMed ID: 10915915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Experience modulates emission of food calls in broody hens. Wauters AM; Richard-Yris MA C R Acad Sci III; 2001 Nov; 324(11):1021-7. PubMed ID: 11725700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The ontogeny of a pecking preference in domestic chicks. Dawkins R Z Tierpsychol; 1968 Mar; 25(2):170-86. PubMed ID: 5684149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Inborn orientation procedures during feeding in guillemots (Uria aalge aalge Pont.)]. Oberholzer A Z Tierpsychol; 1975; (39):150-72. PubMed ID: 1231419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Vision and touch in relation to foraging and predator detection: insightful contrasts between a plover and a sandpiper. Martin GR; Piersma T Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Feb; 276(1656):437-45. PubMed ID: 18842546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Feed pecking in young chickens: new techniques of evaluation. Yo T; Vilariño M; Faure JM; Picard M Physiol Behav; 1997 Jun; 61(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 9177550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Chick colour approach preferences are altered by cold stress; colour pecking and approach preferences are the same. Davis SJ; Fischer GJ Anim Behav; 1978 Feb; 26(1):259-64. PubMed ID: 565177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Colour preferences of UK garden birds at supplementary seed feeders. Rothery L; Scott GW; Morrell LJ PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172422. PubMed ID: 28212435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Modifiability of responsiveness in a visual projection area of the chick brain: visual experience is only one of several factors involved. Payne JK; Horn G; Brown MW Behav Brain Res; 1984 Aug; 13(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 6487406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Visually-naïve chicks prefer agents that move as if constrained by a bilateral body-plan. Rosa-Salva O; Hernik M; Broseghini A; Vallortigara G Cognition; 2018 Apr; 173():106-114. PubMed ID: 29367016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Statistical learning in domestic chicks is modulated by strain and sex. Santolin C; Rosa-Salva O; Lemaire BS; Regolin L; Vallortigara G Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15140. PubMed ID: 32934260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Innate visual form preferences in the pecking behavior of young chicks. Goodwin EB; Hess EH Behaviour; 1969; 34(4):223-37. PubMed ID: 5351695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Mothering influences the distribution of activity in young domestic chicks. Wauters AM; Perré Y; Bizeray D; Leterrier C; Richard-Yris MA Chronobiol Int; 2002 May; 19(3):543-59. PubMed ID: 12069037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Social influences of competition on impulsive choices in domestic chicks. Amita H; Kawamori A; Matsushima T Biol Lett; 2010 Apr; 6(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 19906684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Visual fields in flamingos: chick-feeding versus filter-feeding. Martin GR; Jarrett N; Tovey P; White CR Naturwissenschaften; 2005 Aug; 92(8):351-4. PubMed ID: 16088378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]