BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1365819)

  • 1. The acceptability of Norplant in Egypt.
    Hassan EO; Kafafi L; el Husseini M; Hardee-Cleaveland K; Potter L
    Adv Contracept; 1992 Dec; 8(4):331-48. PubMed ID: 1365819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptability of Norplant-2 rods as a method of family planning.
    Singh K; Viegas OA; Ratnam SS
    Contraception; 1992 May; 45(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 1623717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the acceptability of NORPLANT implants in four countries: findings from focus group research.
    Zimmerman M; Haffey J; Crane E; Szumowski D; Alvarez F; Bhiromrut P; Brache V; Lubis F; Salah M; Shaaban M
    Stud Fam Plann; 1990; 21(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 2112794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experience with NORPLANT in Egypt.
    Shaaban MM
    Ann Med; 1993 Apr; 25(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 8489755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase III clinical trial with Norplant II (two covered rods): report on five years of use.
    Contraception; 1993 Aug; 48(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 8403909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Education and counseling for Norplant users.
    Hinkle LT
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1994 Jun; 23(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 8083779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
    Fleming D; Davie J; Glasier A
    Contraception; 1998 Jan; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acceptance and perceptions of NORPLANT among users in San Francisco, USA.
    Darney PD; Atkinson E; Tanner S; MacPherson S; Hellerstein S; Alvarado A
    Stud Fam Plann; 1990; 21(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 2115699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
    Akhter H; Dunson TR; Amatya RN; Begum K; Chowdhury T; Dighe N; Krueger SL; Rahman S
    Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptance, efficacy, and side effects of Norplant implants in four counties in north China.
    Tu P; Qiu S; Fang H; Smith HL
    Stud Fam Plann; 1997 Jun; 28(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 9216032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Norplant contraceptive acceptability among women in five Asian countries.
    Krueger SL; Dunson TR; Amatya RN
    Contraception; 1994 Oct; 50(4):349-61. PubMed ID: 7813223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Return of fertility following discontinuation of Norplant-II subdermal implants. ICMR Task Force on Hormonal Contraception.
    Buckshee K; Chatterjee P; Dhall GI; Hazra MN; Kodkany BS; Lalitha K; Logambal A; Manchanda P; Nanda UK; RaiChoudhury G
    Contraception; 1995 Apr; 51(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7796589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the acceptability of Norplant contraceptive in four patient populations.
    Dugoff L; Jones OW; Allen-Davis J; Hurst BS; Schlaff WD
    Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8521714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
    Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Sirisumpan S; Tang-usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
    Contraception; 1996 Jan; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preliminary experience with Norplant in an inner city population.
    Cullins VE; Blumenthal PD; Remsburg RE; Huggins GR
    Contraception; 1993 Feb; 47(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 8449019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics and experiences of American women electing for early removal of contraceptive implants.
    Frank ML; Ditmore JR; Ilegbodu AE; Bateman L; Poindexter AN
    Contraception; 1995 Sep; 52(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 7587187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Norplant implants in Ethiopia.
    Argina H; Lukman HY
    East Afr Med J; 1997 Apr; 74(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 9299831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
    Kirkman RJ; Bromham DR; O'Connor TP; Sahota JE
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subdermal contraceptive implants in nurse-midwifery practice.
    Emerling JM; Paluzzi P; Leiva J; Cullins VE
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1993; 38(2 Suppl):80S-87S. PubMed ID: 8483013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal.
    Haugen MM; Evans CB; Kim MH
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 8951137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.