These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13669578)

  • 1. [Incorporation of the Rh system into the Essen-Möller formula for expert testimony on paternity probability. I. Calculation of determined or estimated Rh genotypes].
    HUMMEL K
    Z Immun exp ther; 1959 May; 117(5):341-62. PubMed ID: 13669578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Incorporation of the Rh system in the Essen-Möller formula for expert testimony of paternity probability. II. Calculation with undetermined Rh genotypes (combination calculation)].
    HUMMEL K; KOENNECKE U
    Z Immun exp ther; 1959 May; 117(5):363-75. PubMed ID: 13669579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The HL-A system in cases of disputed paternity with regard to the value of proof (percentage accuracy) (author's transl)].
    Speiser P
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1975 May; 87(10):321-6. PubMed ID: 1220253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The practical significance of the Essen-Moeller method and the "Rh combination calculation" for serological paternity expert testimony with use of the ABO, MN, Rh, Kell and P systems. III. The efficacy of the method in cases with two or more men, empirically determined].
    HUMMEL K; SCHMIDTKE I
    Z Immun exp ther; 1959 Aug; 118():108-20. PubMed ID: 14405353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Positive paternity determination with the Essen-Möller seologic biostatic method].
    Gross H; Gross HG
    Med Welt; 1969 Aug; 33():1776-8. PubMed ID: 5357976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Expert testimony on paternity through the classification of genotypes in the Gm-system].
    Schwerd W; Mad G
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1973; 30():403-5. PubMed ID: 4702777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Practical usefulness of the Essen-Möller procedure for serological paternity determination in use of the ABO, MN, Rh, P and Kell systems. I. Efficiency of this method in one man cases, mathematically calculated].
    HUMMEL K
    Z Immun exp ther; 1959 Jun; 117(6):482-93. PubMed ID: 13669586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Usefulness of evaluating the probability of homozygotism with regard to the Dd features of the Rh system in the father in comparison with the homozygotism of the child in cases of disputed paternity].
    Garbalińska G
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1982; 28():235-48. PubMed ID: 6820238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of calculated probability of paternity on the basis of blood group characteristics with opinion of expert testimony on biological heredity in 165 cases].
    PROKOP O; SCHNEIDER W
    Dtsch Z Gesamte Gerichtl Med; 1958; 47(3):484-501. PubMed ID: 13597642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Blood group opinion and judicial judgement 1. 250 paternity cases 1965-1970 (author's transl)].
    Hellenbroich H; Hummel K; Pulverer G
    Z Immunitatsforsch Exp Klin Immunol; 1975 Jul; 149(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 126577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The blood group systen Gm-a Gm-b in paternity expert testimony: probability values based on the Essen-Moeller formula].
    WICHMANN D
    Blut; 1962 May; 8():167-8. PubMed ID: 14006701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Calculation of gene-frequencies of the Ka sign and degree of exclusion probability using this sign in serological paternity expert evaluation].
    Klose I
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1973; 30():214-6. PubMed ID: 4540824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The assumption of prior probability computing the plausibility of paternity by the Essen-Möller equation and its problem].
    Sorgo G
    Z Rechtsmed; 1971; 69(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 5146293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Expert testimony on paternity cases].
    TRUBE-BECKER E
    Med Klin; 1958 May; 53(21):939-40. PubMed ID: 13565263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Experiences with the Essen-Möller formula in the calculation of the probability of disputed paternity].
    WICHMANN D
    Acta Genet Stat Med; 1952; 3(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 13050324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Blood group expert testimony: anthropologico-heredobiological expert testimony. Proof value in forensic paternity lawsuits].
    Dahr P
    Med Welt; 1968 Nov; 48():2674-5. PubMed ID: 5730616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of probability concepts in blood group expert evaluation].
    Schwerd W; Mad G
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1973; 30():406-10. PubMed ID: 4702778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Homozygosity DD and heterozygosity Dd and the possibility of exclusion of paternity].
    Marcinkowski T
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1980 Jan; 35(1):33-4. PubMed ID: 6768058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Scientific significance of dermatoglyphic examination in the framework of medico-legal expert testimony in the study of filiation].
    Enescu I; Terbancea M
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1985; 35(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 2979330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Expert testimony on paternity according to modern scientific knowledge].
    HOSEMANN H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1954 Apr; 14(4):300-10. PubMed ID: 13183312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.