These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13677220)
1. United States Supreme Court upholds "any willing provider" statutes. Blumenreich GA AANA J; 2003 Aug; 71(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 13677220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Willing and able. Supreme Court ruling forces HMOs to open networks to any willing provider; some say it may wound managed-care industry. Benko LB Mod Healthc; 2003 Apr; 33(14):6-7, 1. PubMed ID: 12712635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent significant federal and state court decisions and statutes that affect managed care provider contracting. Rich JP; Rinn CC; Morgan SD Manag Care Q; 2003; 11(2):39-47. PubMed ID: 12968444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Kentucky's 'any-willing-provider' law: Supreme Court says ERISA does not pre-empt statute. Sfikas PM J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Jun; 134(6):766-7. PubMed ID: 12839414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Open, sesame! Is 'any willing provider' the magic phrase NPs need to open provider panels? Tumolo J Adv Nurse Pract; 2004 Feb; 12(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 14986498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations. Trueman DL J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AIDS caps, contraceptive coverage, and the law: an analysis of the federal anti-discrimination statutes' applicability to health insurance. Hoffman S Cardozo Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 23(4):1315-62. PubMed ID: 16506334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Supreme Court deals another blow to managed care industry. Kentucky Ass'n of Health Plans v. Miller. Hosp Law Newsl; 2003 Jul; 20(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 12833717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ready and willing. Borges W Tex Med; 2003 Jun; 99(6):35-7. PubMed ID: 12836574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Kentucky association of health plans v. Miller: any willing provider laws survive supreme court review. Liang BA J Clin Anesth; 2003 Nov; 15(7):549-51. PubMed ID: 14698371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Supreme Court watch: redistricting commissions and federal health care exchanges are the focus of two important cases now in the hands of Supreme Court justices. Soronen L State Legis; 2015 Apr; 41(4):19. PubMed ID: 25946755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of federalism in defining essential health benefits. Weil A N Engl J Med; 2012 Feb; 366(8):679-81. PubMed ID: 22316423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]