These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13677758)
21. NCCLS simplifies the order of draw: a brief history. Ernst DJ; Calam R MLO Med Lab Obs; 2004 May; 36(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 15179915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Standardization of the analysis of cholesterol and glucose according to the International Program 1. Description of the methods and various aspects of standardization]. Toleĭkis AI; Glazunov IS; Margiavichene LE Ter Arkh; 1977; 49(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 898044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Blood collection simplified. Warner S RN; 2009 Jun; 72(6):24-7. PubMed ID: 19639689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Medical errors: impact on clinical laboratories and other critical areas. Kalra J Clin Biochem; 2004 Dec; 37(12):1052-62. PubMed ID: 15589810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducing laboratory errors. Da Rin G Clin Chim Acta; 2009 Jun; 404(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 19302988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preanalytical and postanalytical variables: the leading causes of diagnostic error in hemostasis? Favaloro EJ; Lippi G; Adcock DM Semin Thromb Hemost; 2008 Oct; 34(7):612-34. PubMed ID: 19085762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How I minimize mistransfusion risk in my hospital. Aubuchon JP Transfusion; 2006 Jul; 46(7):1085-9. PubMed ID: 16836553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Standardization and quality control in gene--based testing]. Funato T; Takeda M Nihon Rinsho; 2005 Dec; 63 Suppl 12():134-8. PubMed ID: 16416783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Are we drawing too much blood? Kattan D MLO Med Lab Obs; 1986 Mar; 18(3):75-6. PubMed ID: 10276409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality and reliability of routine coagulation testing: can we trust that sample? Lippi G; Franchini M; Montagnana M; Salvagno GL; Poli G; Guidi GC Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2006 Oct; 17(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 16988544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dried blood spot methods in therapeutic drug monitoring: methods, assays, and pitfalls. Edelbroek PM; van der Heijden J; Stolk LM Ther Drug Monit; 2009 Jun; 31(3):327-36. PubMed ID: 19349929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [What is "professionally defendable"?]. Aschehoug S Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Mar; 129(6):541-2; author reply 542. PubMed ID: 19282896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Pre-analytical factors and measurement uncertainty. Kouri T; Siloaho M; Pohjavaara S; Koskinen P; Malminiemi O; Pohja-Nylander P; Puukka R Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2005; 65(6):463-75. PubMed ID: 16179279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Deciphering Sources of Variability in Clinical Pathology-It's Not Just about the Numbers. Everds NE Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Feb; 45(2):275-280. PubMed ID: 28178898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Why the need to reduce medical errors is not obvious. Buetow S J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Feb; 11(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 15660537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Garbage in-garbage out: influence of preanalytical variables on hematological analysis]. Savoca R; Huber AR Ther Umsch; 2004 Feb; 61(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 15018390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment Of Preanalytical Blood Sampling Errors In Clinical Settings. Zehra N; Malik AH; Arshad Q; Sarwar S; Aslam S J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2016; 28(2):267-270. PubMed ID: 28718540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]