These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13678031)

  • 1. Lawsuits target medical research.
    Dembner A
    IRB; 2002; 24(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 13678031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
    Noah BA
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
    Katerberg RJ
    J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.
    Jansson RL
    Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Federal case is settled over death of research subject.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Apr; 20(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 16018114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.
    Vernillo A
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual researcher liability for clinical research on humans.
    Miller RK
    J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(2):8-16. PubMed ID: 14682365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving protection for human research subjects: better oversight, not just more oversight.
    Schluger NW
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):13-5. PubMed ID: 19061098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical trials litigation: practical realities as seen from the trenches.
    Morreim EH
    Account Res; 2005; 12(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 16021792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Institutional conflicts of interest and research with human subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Feb; 18(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12814111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ethics of clinical trials: to inform or not inform? That is the question.
    Spence EH
    Prof Ethics; 1998; 6(3-4):173-84. PubMed ID: 11838496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New Developments in Human Subjects Protections: Proposed Updates to the Common Rule.
    Weinmeyer R
    AMA J Ethics; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1147-51. PubMed ID: 26698588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal liabilities in research: early lessons from North America.
    Zlotnik Shaul R; Birenbaum S; Evans M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2005 Jun; 6():E4. PubMed ID: 15953387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lawsuits against IRBs: accountability or incongruity?
    Anderlik MR; Elster N
    J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 11508198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Former human subjects sue over their allegations of inadequate informed consent.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Aug; 20(8):8. PubMed ID: 16320461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parents say federal agency helps protect researchers from more than their subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 11913435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vulnerable subjects and Canadian research governance.
    Wilson M
    IRB; 2005; 27(6):9-11. PubMed ID: 16425479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent is binding contract: Dahl v. HEM Pharmaceuticals.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Dec; 10(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11653220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research firm changes subject notification procedure after complaint by potential subject.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Nov; 17(11):6-7. PubMed ID: 12708413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.