These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1367834)
41. Problems in the introduction of genetically engineered microorganisms into the environment. Gorlach K Acta Microbiol Pol; 1994; 43(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 7530892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Testimony of Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, the Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research and Environment, and the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology, July 23, 1986. Moore JA Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1986 Sep; 9(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 3786829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; announcement of policy; notice for public comment. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy Fed Regist; 1986 Jun; 51(123):23302-50. PubMed ID: 11655807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. From Asilomar to industrial biotechnology: risks, reductionism and regulation. Krimsky S Sci Cult (Lond); 2005 Dec; 14(4):309-23. PubMed ID: 16619467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Congressional hearing on the adequacy of current statutes and scientific knowledge for the regulation of biotechnology. Milewski E Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1985 Mar; 8(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 3858924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Environmental issues in the planned release of genetically-engineered organisms. Sarma V Aust J Biotechnol; 1989 Jan; 3(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 2485312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Environmental pollution policies in light of biotechnological assessment: Organisation for Economic Cooperation, United Kingdom, and European Economic Council perspectives. Bull AT; Holt G; Hardman DJ Basic Life Sci; 1988; 45():351-71. PubMed ID: 3052413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The Cambridge model: how public oversight of biotech is good for everyone--even business. Lipson S Genewatch; 2003; 16(5):7-10. PubMed ID: 15025120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Using microorganisms for bioremediation: the barriers to implementation. Broda P Trends Biotechnol; 1992 Sep; 10(9):303-4. PubMed ID: 1369086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. OMB challenges plan to regulate biotechnology. Sun M Science; 1984 May; 224(4648):472. PubMed ID: 6584977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology; establishment of the Biotechnology Science Coordinating Committee; notice. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy Fed Regist; 1985 Nov; 50(220):47174-95. PubMed ID: 11655733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Safe biotechnology (4). Recommendations for safety levels for biotechnological operations with microorganisms that cause diseases in plants. Frommer W; Archer L; Boon B; Brunius G; Collins CH; Crooy P; Donikian R; Economidis I; Frontali C; Gaal T Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 1992 Nov; 38(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 1369136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. European attitudes on the regulation of modern biotechnology and their consequences. Cantley M GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22430837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Micro-organisms as fertilizers and pest control agents in agricultural crops. Erceg D; O'Brien P; Glenn AR Aust J Biotechnol; 1990 Jul; 4(3):177-82, 200. PubMed ID: 1369277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Experiences from the implementation of a biosafety system in Slovenia. Milavec M; Racman DS Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1093-104. PubMed ID: 17703486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]