126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13679261)
1. Small-vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes by using CT angiography.
Hähnel S; Trossbach M; Braun C; Heiland S; Knauth M; Sartor K; Hartmann M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Sep; 24(8):1512-6. PubMed ID: 13679261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carotid artery stents on CT angiography: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using 16-, 64- and 320-row CT scanners.
Lettau M; Kotter E; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
J Neuroradiol; 2014 Oct; 41(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 24411522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents using two different angiography systems.
Lettau M; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
J Neuroradiol; 2013 Dec; 40(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 23660542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.
Lettau M; Sauer A; Heiland S; Rohde S; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Nov; 30(10):1993-7. PubMed ID: 19749216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro evaluation of in-stent stenoses using CT angiography.
Trossbach M; Hartmann M; Braun C; Sartor K; Hähnel S
Neuroradiology; 2004 Jun; 46(6):459-63. PubMed ID: 15127168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents-does stent orientation matter?
Lettau M; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
Neuroradiology; 2013 Jun; 55(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 23411716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents: a pixel-by-pixel analysis using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 T.
Lettau M; Sauer A; Heiland S; Rohde S; Reinhardt J; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
Neuroradiology; 2010 Sep; 52(9):823-30. PubMed ID: 19924409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?
Wolf F; Feuchtner GM; Homolka P; Langenberger H; Stadler A; Bader TR; Weber M; Lammer J; Loewe C
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 17913428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of middle cerebral artery stents using multidetector row CT angiography in vivo study: comparison of the three different kernels.
Jang JH; Lim YS; Lee YJ; Yoo WJ; Sung MS; Kim BS
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 22393160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3.0 Tesla contrast-enhanced MR angiography of carotid artery stents: in vitro measurements as compared with 1.5 Tesla.
Hähnel S; Nguyen-Trong TH; Rohde S; Hartmann M; Braun C; Sartor K; Heiland S
J Neuroradiol; 2006 Apr; 33(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16733419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multislice CT angiography of the iliac arteries in the presence of various stents: in vitro evaluation of artifacts and lumen visibility.
Maintz D; Fischbach R; Juergens KU; Allkemper T; Wessling J; Heindel W
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):699-704. PubMed ID: 11753140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improvement of in-stent lumen measurement accuracy with new high-definition CT in a phantom model: comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT.
Tanami Y; Jinzaki M; Yamada M; Imai Y; Segawa K; Kuribayashi S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Feb; 28(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 21222034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appearance of vascular stents in computed tomographic angiography: in vitro examination of 14 different stent types.
Strotzer M; Lenhart M; Butz B; Völk M; Manke C; Feuerbach S
Invest Radiol; 2001 Nov; 36(11):652-8. PubMed ID: 11606843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stent-assisted intracranial angioplasty: potentials and limitations of pre- and postinterventional CT angiography].
Schlötzer W; Huber R; Schmitz BL
Rofo; 2009 Feb; 181(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19173154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photon-Counting CT: High-Resolution Imaging of Coronary Stents.
Mannil M; Hickethier T; von Spiczak J; Baer M; Henning A; Hertel M; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Maintz D; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):143-149. PubMed ID: 28945655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Next generation coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 27 coronary stents.
Gassenmaier T; Petri N; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Maintz D; Voelker W; Bley TA
Eur Radiol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):2953-61. PubMed ID: 25038859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Coronary Stent Imaging: Evaluation of the Potential Clinical Impact for the Delineation of In-Stent Restenosis.
Bratke G; Hickethier T; Bar-Ness D; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Pahn G; Coulon P; Si-Mohamed S; Douek P; Sigovan M
Invest Radiol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):61-67. PubMed ID: 31524765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.
Maintz D; Seifarth H; Raupach R; Flohr T; Rink M; Sommer T; Ozgün M; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Eur Radiol; 2006 Apr; 16(4):818-26. PubMed ID: 16333623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.
Das KM; El-Menyar AA; Salam AM; Singh R; Dabdoob WA; Albinali HA; Al Suwaidi J
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 17890354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of contrast concentration, tube potential and reconstruction kernels on MDCT evaluation of coronary stents: an in vitro study.
Sirineni GK; Kalra MK; Pottala K; Waldrop S; Syed M; Tigges S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2007 Apr; 23(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 16821123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
