These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation. Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery. Rzhetsky A; Foster JG; Foster IT; Evans JA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Nov; 112(47):14569-74. PubMed ID: 26554009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of inspiration in scientific scholarship and discovery: views of theistic scientists. O'Grady KA; Richards PS Explore (NY); 2011; 7(6):354-62. PubMed ID: 22051559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives. Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The science of research: the principles underlying the discovery of cognitive and other biological mechanisms. Silva AJ J Physiol Paris; 2007; 101(4-6):203-13. PubMed ID: 18280120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should We All be Scientists? Re-thinking Laboratory Research as a Calling. Bezuidenhout L; Warne NA Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1161-1179. PubMed ID: 28726028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual self-images of scientists and science in Greece. Christidou V; Kouvatas A Public Underst Sci; 2013 Jan; 22(1):91-109. PubMed ID: 23832887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists. Nagy P; Wylie R; Eschrich J; Finn E Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1143-1159. PubMed ID: 28653167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement. Dudo A; Besley JC PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148867. PubMed ID: 26913869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mavericks versus team players: the trade-off between shared glory and making a personal contribution. Charlton BG Med Hypotheses; 2008 Aug; 71(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 18524494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Riesch H; Potter C Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):107-20. PubMed ID: 23982281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific Training in the Era of Big Data: A New Pedagogy for Graduate Education. Aikat J; Carsey TM; Fecho K; Jeffay K; Krishnamurthy A; Mucha PJ; Rajasekar A; Ahalt SC Big Data; 2017 Mar; 5(1):12-18. PubMed ID: 28287837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring mumbo jumbo: A preliminary quantification of the use of jargon in science communication. Sharon AJ; Baram-Tsabari A Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jul; 23(5):528-46. PubMed ID: 23825277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Four stages of a scientific discipline; four types of scientist. Shneider AM Trends Biochem Sci; 2009 May; 34(5):217-23. PubMed ID: 19362484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thinking like a scientist: innateness as a case study. Knobe J; Samuels R Cognition; 2013 Jan; 126(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 23063235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Science in the crosshairs of enlightenment. Significance of hypothetical thinking]. Wieland W Acta Hist Leopoldina; 2011; (57):99-130. PubMed ID: 22397137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of social identity threat and social identity affirmation on laypersons' perception of scientists. Nauroth P; Gollwitzer M; Kozuchowski H; Bender J; Rothmund T Public Underst Sci; 2017 Oct; 26(7):754-770. PubMed ID: 26902257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]