These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

38 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 136943)

  • 1. [Recording the monocular field of vision with the Goldmann perimeter. Value of the method].
    Larmande A; Poletti J
    Arch Ophtalmol (Paris); 1976 May; 36(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 136943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matched comparison of Goldmann perimetry and automated two-zone suprathreshold Dicon perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Levy NS; Ellis E
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1985 Apr; 17(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 4004003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
    Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated perimetry in a neuro-ophthalmologic practice.
    Schindler S; McCrary JA
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1981 Jun; 13(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 7258961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical comparison of visual field testing between Goldmann-type manual perimetry and the Marco MT-336 automated perimeter.
    Jennings BJ; Drake SA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Dec; 62(12):914-22. PubMed ID: 1814984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Hemispherical perimeter for the study of spatial summation in the field of vision].
    Zaretskaia RB; Perl'shteĭn EL; Tuchin AD
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1975; (6):63-5. PubMed ID: 1224483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Adaptation of Goldmann's cupula to the detection of subjective cyclodiplopia. Preliminary study].
    George JL; Oliveiri D; Bastien M; Cordonnier MO; Richard M; Raspiller A
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1990 Jan; 90(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 2350856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Automatic perimeter "Octopus" (according to Fankhauser). A clinical comparison with the visual field device of Goldmann (author's transl)].
    Kampik A; Lund OE; Greite JH
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1979 Jul; 175(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 491470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Vigabatrin and visual field defects. A Danish material with evaluation of different screening methods].
    Riise P; Fledelius HC; Rogvi-Hansen Bà
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(10):1034-8. PubMed ID: 12645411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of glaucomatous visual fields using the black tangent screen and the Goldmann perimeter.
    Portney GL; Rubenzer MA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1972; 17(3):164-7. PubMed ID: 4137588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of manual Goldmann and automated static visual fields using the Dicon 2000 perimeter in the detection of chiasmal tumors.
    Wirtschafter JD; Coffman SM
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1984 Aug; 16(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 6497219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Advances in the automation of perimetry (author's transl)].
    Spahr J; Fankhauser F; Bebié H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1976 Jan; 168(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 789999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The advantages and limits of computerized static perimetry].
    Kaucsár E
    Oftalmologia; 1997; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9138491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Critical study of the Octopus 2000 perimeter].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1986 Mar; 86(3):421-5. PubMed ID: 3802358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Static vs dynamic visual field evaluation; with emphasis on the utility of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer.
    Yellen M; Sherman J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jan; 50(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 762380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral sensitivity measurements performed with the Goldmann perimeter.
    Airas K
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl; 1981; 148():1-64. PubMed ID: 6297231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Practical experiences with the Octopus automatic perimeter (author's transl)].
    Spahr J; Fankhauser F; Jenni A; Bebie H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1978 Apr; 172(4):470-7. PubMed ID: 651213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss.
    Nowomiejska K; Vonthein R; Paetzold J; Zagorski Z; Kardon R; Schiefer U
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1343-54. PubMed ID: 15996734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional field score: the effect of using a Goldmann V-4e isopter instead of a Goldmann III-4e isopter.
    Langelaan M; Wouters B; Moll AC; de Boer MR; van Rens GH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):1817-23. PubMed ID: 16638986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.