116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13697513)
1. The description and interpretation of pictures in cases of brain lesion.
ETTLINGER G
J Ment Sci; 1960 Oct; 106():1337-46. PubMed ID: 13697513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A transposed analysis of the Bender Gestalts of brain disease cases.
GUERTIN WH
J Clin Psychol; 1954 Oct; 10(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 13201660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Experiences with the Grassi test].
BOEKE PE
Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1956; 11(6):433-46. PubMed ID: 13407784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis of figure rotations.
HOVEY HB
J Consult Psychol; 1961 Feb; 25():21-3. PubMed ID: 13716197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of the organic signs in the H-T-P drawings.
BIELIAUSKAS VJ; KIRKHAM SL
J Clin Psychol; 1958 Jan; 14(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 13481148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of human figure drawings in the diagnosis of organic pathology.
REZNIKOFF M; TOMBLEN D
J Consult Psychol; 1956 Dec; 20(6):467-70. PubMed ID: 13376781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The psychological differentiation of organic brain lesions and their localization by means of the Rorschach test.
DORKEN H; KRAL VA
Am J Psychiatry; 1952 Apr; 108(10):764-70. PubMed ID: 14914905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation study of the Kahn test of symbol arrangement.
THEINER EC; HILL LK; LATHAM WR; McCARTY WD
J Clin Psychol; 1962 Oct; 18():454-7. PubMed ID: 13920530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effectiveness of clinicians' judgments; the diagnosis of organic brain damage from the Bender-Gestalt test.
GOLDBERG LR
J Consult Psychol; 1959 Feb; 23(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 13641486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of three projective techniques in differentiating brain damage among subjects with normal IQs.
Wagner EE; Maloney P; Walter T
J Clin Psychol; 1980 Oct; 36(4):968-72. PubMed ID: 7002955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A preliminary report on a technique designed to differentiate patients with cerebral pathology and psychoneurosis.
TOLOR A
J Clin Psychol; 1954 Jan; 10(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 13117979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A genetic evaluation of perceptual structurization in cerebral pathology: an investigation by means of the Rorschach test.
PENA CD
J Proj Tech; 1953 Jun; 17(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 13062260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiation of brain damage among low IQ subjects with three projective techniques.
Wagner EE; Klein I; Walter T
J Pers Assess; 1978 Feb; 42(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 342684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [TOPICAL BRAIN DIAGNOSIS BY DRAWING TESTS].
SUCHENWIRTH R
Med Klin; 1965 Feb; 60():333-7. PubMed ID: 14265247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Moving pictures and projective techniques].
FULCHIGNONI E; SBORDONI G; TARRONI E
Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr; 1950 Apr; 11(2):97-169. PubMed ID: 24537176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Defective pictorial interpretation: a pervading deficit in patients with higher nervous dysfunction.
Critchley M
Neurol Neurochir Pol; 1982; (5-6):329-32. PubMed ID: 6759967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Projective pictures as interview devices.
HEPPELL HK; RAIMY VC
J Consult Psychol; 1951 Oct; 15(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 14880641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Approaches to reliability of projective tests with special reference to the Blacky pictures test.
GRANICK S; SCHEFLEN NA
J Consult Psychol; 1958 Apr; 22(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 13587724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [OPTIC AGNOSIA: SEMEIOLOGICAL AND PATHOGENETIC ASPECTS].
AMBROSETTO C; GENTILI C
Riv Otoneurooftalmol; 1963; 38():349-408. PubMed ID: 14091072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychoanalytic concepts and principles discernible in projective personality tests; workshop, 1956. 5. The psychoanalytic interpretation of dreams and projective techniques.
FROMM E
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1958 Jan; 28(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 13498114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
