121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13716197)
1. An analysis of figure rotations.
HOVEY HB
J Consult Psychol; 1961 Feb; 25():21-3. PubMed ID: 13716197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bender-Gestalt figure rotations: a stimulus factor.
GRIFFITH RM; TAYLOR VH
J Consult Psychol; 1961 Feb; 25():89-90. PubMed ID: 13708603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of human figure drawings in the diagnosis of organic pathology.
REZNIKOFF M; TOMBLEN D
J Consult Psychol; 1956 Dec; 20(6):467-70. PubMed ID: 13376781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Causative factors in the production of rotations on the Bender-Gestalt designs.
HANNAH LD
J Consult Psychol; 1958 Oct; 22(5):398-9. PubMed ID: 13587796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The rotation of drawings by brain-damaged patients.
YATES AJ
J Abnorm Psychol; 1956 Sep; 53(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 13357211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotation errors made by brain-injured and familial children on two visual-motor tests.
HALPIN VG
Am J Ment Defic; 1954 Jan; 59(3):485-9. PubMed ID: 13218067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Experiences with the Grassi test].
BOEKE PE
Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1956; 11(6):433-46. PubMed ID: 13407784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The description and interpretation of pictures in cases of brain lesion.
ETTLINGER G
J Ment Sci; 1960 Oct; 106():1337-46. PubMed ID: 13697513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A transposed analysis of the Bender Gestalts of brain disease cases.
GUERTIN WH
J Clin Psychol; 1954 Oct; 10(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 13201660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the organic signs in the H-T-P drawings.
BIELIAUSKAS VJ; KIRKHAM SL
J Clin Psychol; 1958 Jan; 14(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 13481148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The psychological differentiation of organic brain lesions and their localization by means of the Rorschach test.
DORKEN H; KRAL VA
Am J Psychiatry; 1952 Apr; 108(10):764-70. PubMed ID: 14914905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation study of the Kahn test of symbol arrangement.
THEINER EC; HILL LK; LATHAM WR; McCARTY WD
J Clin Psychol; 1962 Oct; 18():454-7. PubMed ID: 13920530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of clinicians' judgments; the diagnosis of organic brain damage from the Bender-Gestalt test.
GOLDBERG LR
J Consult Psychol; 1959 Feb; 23(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 13641486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of three projective techniques in differentiating brain damage among subjects with normal IQs.
Wagner EE; Maloney P; Walter T
J Clin Psychol; 1980 Oct; 36(4):968-72. PubMed ID: 7002955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A preliminary report on a technique designed to differentiate patients with cerebral pathology and psychoneurosis.
TOLOR A
J Clin Psychol; 1954 Jan; 10(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 13117979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A genetic evaluation of perceptual structurization in cerebral pathology: an investigation by means of the Rorschach test.
PENA CD
J Proj Tech; 1953 Jun; 17(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 13062260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation of brain damage among low IQ subjects with three projective techniques.
Wagner EE; Klein I; Walter T
J Pers Assess; 1978 Feb; 42(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 342684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [TOPICAL BRAIN DIAGNOSIS BY DRAWING TESTS].
SUCHENWIRTH R
Med Klin; 1965 Feb; 60():333-7. PubMed ID: 14265247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Figure painting as a cerebral function test].
Tägert J; Penn HJ; Sipos J
Nervenarzt; 1973 May; 44(5):263-7. PubMed ID: 4352273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors influencing rotation in the Bender-Gestalt performance of children.
FULLER JB; CHAGNON G
J Proj Tech; 1962 Mar; 26():36-46. PubMed ID: 13895859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
