259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1372416)
1. A new pacemaker algorithm for continuous capture verification and automatic threshold determination: elimination of pacemaker afterpotential utilizing a triphasic charge balancing system.
Feld GK; Love CJ; Camerlo J; Marsella R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Feb; 15(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 1372416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uni- and bipolar pacing threshold measurements with capturecontrol, a new automatic pacemaker function for capture verification. Comparison of the automatic and the manual pacing threshold measurement.
Schuchert A; Meinertz T
Cardiology; 1999; 92(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 10754353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing automatic threshold tracking for continuous capture verification: a single-center prospective study.
Verma PK; Sharma JK; Khan IA; Bali HK; Varma JS; Bhargava M; Sharma YP; Grover A
Indian Heart J; 2001; 53(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 11759937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new algorithm for minimizing pacemaker polarization artifact: universally applicable in permanent pacing systems.
Curtis AB; Vance F; Quist SM; Domijan A; Keim SG; Duran A; Miller K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1803-8. PubMed ID: 1721179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chronic ventricular pacing using an output amplitude of 1.0 volt.
Schwaab B; Schwerdt H; Heisel A; Fröhlig G; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2171-8. PubMed ID: 9309740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A method for analysis of the local atrial evoked response for determination of atrial capture in permanent pacing systems.
Curtis AB; Maas SM; Domijan A; Keim SG; Duran A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 1):1576-81. PubMed ID: 1721145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity.
Schuchert A; Meinertz T;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. PubMed ID: 11523609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficiency of pulse charge multiplication for chronic ventricular output programming.
Kindermann M; Kusch O; Fröhlig G; Markwirth T; Schwaab B; Schwerdt H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Apr; 24(4 Pt 1):430-40. PubMed ID: 11341079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term follow-up of pacemakers with an Autocapture pacing system.
Erdinler I; Akyol A; Okmen E; Oguz E; Gurkan K; Ulufer T
Jpn Heart J; 2002 Nov; 43(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 12558127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Programming of the pacing impulse in pacemakers connected to steroid lead systems.
Schuchert A; Cappato R; Kuck KH; Meinertz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Feb; 18(2):318-22. PubMed ID: 7731880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction of pacing output coupling capacitance for sensing the evoked response.
Sperzel J; Neuzner J; Schwarz T; Zhu Q; König A; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Sep; 24(9 Pt 1):1377-82. PubMed ID: 11584460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two pacing spikes on the QRS complex in a single-chamber pacemaker.
Choudhary D; Sundaram S; Thajudeen A; Namboodiri N
Indian Heart J; 2012; 64(5):527-9. PubMed ID: 23102397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic reduction of stimulus polarization artifact for accurate evaluation of ventricular evoked responses.
Curtis AB; Vance F; Miller K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Apr; 14(4 Pt 1):529-37. PubMed ID: 1710058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of unipolar and bipolar active fixation atrial pacing leads.
Kay GN; Epstein AE; Plumb VJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 May; 11(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 2456532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Telemetry guided pacemaker programming: impact of output amplitude and the use of low threshold leads on projected pacemaker longevity.
Schwaab B; Fröhlig G; Schwerdt H; Heisel A; Berg M; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2055-63. PubMed ID: 9826856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of a right atrial automatic capture verification algorithm using two different sensing configurations.
Sperzel J; Goetze S; Kennergren C; Biffi M; Brooke MJ; Vireca E; Saha S; Schubert B; Butter C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 May; 32(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 19422578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single lead DDD system: a comparative evaluation of unipolar, bipolar, and overlapping biphasic stimulation and the effects of right atrial floating electrode location on atrial pacing and sensing thresholds.
Tse HF; Lau CP; Leung SK; Leung Z; Mehta N
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1758-63. PubMed ID: 8945035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First derivative of right ventricular pressure, dP/dt, as a sensor for a rate adaptive VVI pacemaker: initial experience.
Ovsyshcher I; Guetta V; Bondy C; Porath A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Feb; 15(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 1372420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of local steroid elution on chronic pacing threshold and impedance of endocardial pacemaker leads.
Schuchert A; Kuck KH
Cardiology; 1993; 83(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 8281540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic capture verification by charge-neutral sensing.
Kadhiresan VA; Olive A; Gornick C; Spinelli J; Villalta D
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Jan; 22(1 Pt 1):73-8. PubMed ID: 9990603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
