These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
66. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Elevations in ventricular pacing threshold with the use of the Y adaptor: implications for biventricular pacing. Rho RW; Patel VV; Gerstenfeld EP; Dixit S; Poku JW; Ross HM; Callans D; Kocovic DZ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Mar; 26(3):747-51. PubMed ID: 12698677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Pacing with capture verification in candidates for resynchronisation therapy: a feasibility study. Biffi M; Boriani G; Bertini M; Silvestri P; Martignani C; Branzi A Europace; 2005 May; 7(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 15878565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Indications for pacemaker insertion: types and modes of pacing. Harthorne JW Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1981; 23(6):393-400. PubMed ID: 7232754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Respiration-dependent ventricular pacing compared with fixed ventricular and atrial-ventricular synchronous pacing: aerobic and hemodynamic variables. Rossi P; Rognoni G; Occhetta E; Aina F; Prando MD; Plicchi G; Minella M J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Sep; 6(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 4031276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Left ventricular pacing by automatic capture verification. Biffi M; Bertini M; Ziacchi M; Boriani G Europace; 2007 Dec; 9(12):1177-81. PubMed ID: 17932022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Clinical evaluation of two different evoked response sensing methods for automatic capture detection in the left ventricle. Goetze S; Sperzel J; Biffi M; Sathaye A; Brooke MJ; Doelger A; Schubert B; Butter C Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jul; 30(7):865-73. PubMed ID: 17584268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. [Uni- and bipolar 2-chamber stimulation with a DDD system of programmable polarity]. Peters W; Greve H; Gülker H; Heuer H Z Kardiol; 1988 Apr; 77(4):201-7. PubMed ID: 3388935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Optimizing pacemaker longevity with pacing mode and settings programming: results from a pacemaker multicenter registry. Benkemoun H; Sacrez J; Lagrange P; Amiel A; Prakash A; Himmrich E; Aimè E; Mairesse GH; Guénon C; Sbragia P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 35(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 22309354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Should unipolar leads be implanted in the atrium? A Holter electrocardiographic comparison of threshold adapted unipolar and high sensitive bipolar sensing. Wiegand UK; Schier H; Bode F; Brandes A; Potratz J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Aug; 21(8):1601-8. PubMed ID: 9725160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Is automatic mode switching effective for atrial arrhythmias occurring at different rates? A study of the efficacy of automatic mode and rate switching to simulated atrial arrhythmias by chest wall stimulation. Leung SK; Lau CP; Lam CT; Tse HF; Lee K; Chan WK; Leung Z Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 May; 23(5):824-31. PubMed ID: 10833701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. [Prerequisites for pacemaker electrodes for individual programming of a low stimulation impulse (comparison of an Elgiloy and a steroid-dependent pacemaker electrode)]. Schuchert A; Kuck KH; Bleifeld W Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 2378158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]