These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1373337)

  • 1. Maximizing opacification during excretory urography: effect of low-osmolarity contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1992 Apr; 43(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 1373337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML; Ellis JV; Klesges LM
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New and old contrast agents: pharmacology, tissue opacification, and excretory urography.
    Spataro RF
    Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 3043872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative study on nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents for drip infused urography].
    Sugaya K; Nishizawa O; Noto H; Suzuki T; Shimoda N; Miyagata S; Harada T; Tsuchida S
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Jul; 38(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 1524001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of excretory urographic contrast effects of dimeric and monomeric non-ionic iodinated contrast media in dogs.
    Kishimoto M; Yamada K; Watanabe A; Miyamoto K; Iwasaki T; Miyake Y
    J Vet Med Sci; 2007 Jul; 69(7):713-5. PubMed ID: 17675802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Excretory phase CT urography for opacification of the urinary collecting system.
    McNicholas MM; Raptopoulos VD; Schwartz RK; Sheiman RG; Zormpala A; Prassopoulos PK; Ernst RD; Pearlman JD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 May; 170(5):1261-7. PubMed ID: 9574598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of single-bolus dual-source dual-energy CT urography in upper tract opacification and diagnostic performance for painless hematuria.
    Sun H; Xue HD; Liu W; Wang X; Chen Y; Su BY; He YL; Zhang DM; Zhu L; Jin ZY
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2014 Jun; 36(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 24997821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical experience with iohexol versus iopromide in excretory urography.
    Bischoff W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():108-10. PubMed ID: 2568776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of urography and renal clearance of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Thomsen HS; Vestergaard A; Dorph S
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Jan; 27(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1733879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unequal doses of ioversol versus diatrizoate for urography.
    Baker MK; Kopecky KK; Bogan M; Wass JL
    Urol Radiol; 1990; 12(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 2281582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Excretory urography: comparison of the ionic contrast medium amidotrezoic acid with the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol].
    Grabenwöger F; Dock W; Pinterits F; Metz V
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Feb; 139(3):48-50. PubMed ID: 2650470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of a non-ionic dimer, iodixanol with a non-ionic monomer, iohexol in low dose intravenous urography.
    Skehan SJ; Rasmussen F; Gibney RG; Lindequist S; Moller-Nielsen S; Svaland MG; Kampenes VB; Bjartveit K; Greaney T; Carlsen SD; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):910-7. PubMed ID: 10195003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between the efficacy of dimeric and monomeric non-ionic contrast media (iodixanol vs iopromide) in urography in patients with macroscopic haematuria.
    Stacul F; Cova M; Pravato M; Floriani I
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Apr; 13(4):810-4. PubMed ID: 12664121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
    Dray RJ; Winfield AC; Muhletaler CA; Kirchner FK
    Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Urography and renal clearance of contrast media. A randomized comparison of an ionic high-osmolar and a non-ionic low-osmolar contrast medium].
    Vestergaard AS; Thomsen HS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jan; 152(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 2405555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-phase dual-energy CT urography in the evaluation of haematuria.
    Ascenti G; Mileto A; Gaeta M; Blandino A; Mazziotti S; Scribano E
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Feb; 68(2):e87-94. PubMed ID: 23219453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media].
    Porst H; Mayer R
    Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pharmacokinetics of iohexol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iosimide compared with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Hartwig P; Mützel W; Taenzer V
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():220-3. PubMed ID: 2568800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tubular nephrotoxicity after intravenous urography with ionic high-osmolal and nonionic low-osmolal contrast media in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.
    Cavaliere G; Arrigo G; D'Amico G; Bernasconi P; Schiavina G; Dellafiore L; Vergnaghi D
    Nephron; 1987; 46(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 2885767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of low-tube-voltage excretory phase images during CT urography: assessment using a dual-energy CT scanner.
    Shinagare AB; Sahni VA; Sadow CA; Erturk SM; Silverman SG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1146-51. PubMed ID: 22021507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.