136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1373577)
1. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. A comparative analysis of sampling methods.
Hall GS; Kramer CE; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 1992 Apr; 16(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 1373577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mesonephric remnant hyperplasia involving prostate and periprostatic tissue: findings at radical prostatectomy.
Chen YB; Fine SW; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jul; 35(7):1054-61. PubMed ID: 21606823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Epstein JI; Pizov G; Walsh PC
Cancer; 1993 Jun; 71(11):3582-93. PubMed ID: 7683970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multivariable analysis of clinical factors predicting for pathological features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schnall M; Tomaszewski J; Schultz D; Kao G; VanArsdalen K; Wein A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Sep; 30(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 7928457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical prostatectomy for impalpable prostate cancer: the Johns Hopkins experience with tumors found on transurethral resection (stages T1A and T1B) and on needle biopsy (stage T1C).
Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Brendler CB
J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1721-9. PubMed ID: 7523719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of capsular perforation and seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer.
Bostwick DG; Qian J; Bergstralh E; Dundore P; Dugan J; Myers RP; Oesterling JE
J Urol; 1996 Apr; 155(4):1361-7. PubMed ID: 8632575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection. The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive.
Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 1990 Jul; 14(7):626-32. PubMed ID: 2356922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Processing radical prostatectomies: an alternate-slice method is comparable with total embedding.
Llanos CA; Blieden C; Vernon SE
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 16(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 22115537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection.
Stamey TA; Villers AA; McNeal JE; Link PC; Freiha FS
J Urol; 1990 Jun; 143(6):1166-72; discussion 1172-3. PubMed ID: 2342177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidental Prostate Adenocarcinoma in Cystoprostatectomy Specimens: Partial Versus Complete Prostate Sampling.
Filter ER; Gabril MY; Gomez JA; Wang PZT; Chin JL; Izawa J; Moussa M
Int J Surg Pathol; 2017 Aug; 25(5):414-420. PubMed ID: 28381150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Sehdev AE; Pan CC; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 May; 32(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 11381367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can stage A1 tumor extent be predicted by transurethral resection tumor volume, per cent or grade? A study of 64 stage A1 radical prostatectomies with comparison to prostates removed for stages A2 and B disease.
Larsen MP; Carter HB; Epstein JI
J Urol; 1991 Oct; 146(4):1059-63. PubMed ID: 1895422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is tumor volume an independent predictor of progression following radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis of 185 clinical stage B adenocarcinomas of the prostate with 5 years of followup.
Epstein JI; Carmichael M; Partin AW; Walsh PC
J Urol; 1993 Jun; 149(6):1478-81. PubMed ID: 8501792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distal seminal vesicle invasion by prostate adenocarcinoma does not occur in isolation of proximal seminal vesicle invasion or lymphovascular infiltration.
Samaratunga H; Samaratunga D; Perry-Keene J; Adamson M; Yaxley J; Delahunt B
Pathology; 2010 Jun; 42(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 20438404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Macroscopic features of prostate cancer.
Lindh C; Delahunt B; Egevad L
Pathology; 2018 Jun; 50(4):382-388. PubMed ID: 29709289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Invasion of Denonvilliers' fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Villers A; McNeal JE; Freiha FS; Boccon-Gibod L; Stamey TA
J Urol; 1993 Apr; 149(4):793-8. PubMed ID: 8455242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer.
Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Levrel O; Katz R; Saint F; de la Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Urology; 2003 Feb; 61(2):386-90. PubMed ID: 12597953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphometric and clinical studies on 68 consecutive radical prostatectomies.
Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Freiha FS; Redwine E
J Urol; 1988 Jun; 139(6):1235-41. PubMed ID: 3373594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
