These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13742097)
1. [Cochlear adaptation to sound intensity]. ROBERT F Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1961; 15():27-82 concl. PubMed ID: 13742097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cochlear adaptation to the intensity of sound]. ROBERT F Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1960; 14():560-602 contd. PubMed ID: 13742098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cochlear adaptation to sound intensity]. ROBERT F Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1960; 14():480-519 contd. PubMed ID: 13742096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory adapation and fatigue in cochlear potentials. GISSELSSON L; SORENSEN H Acta Otolaryngol; 1959; 50():391-405. PubMed ID: 13828214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bandwidth dependency of cochlear centrifugal pathways in modulating hearing desensitization caused by loud sound. Rajan R Neuroscience; 2007 Jul; 147(4):1103-13. PubMed ID: 17600627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Electrophysiologic characteristics of rapid auditory adaptation]. Sagalovich BM; Shipova LI Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1976; 62(6):872-7. PubMed ID: 1010086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limit cycles, noise, and chaos in hearing. Stoop R; Vyver JJ; Kern A Microsc Res Tech; 2004 Apr; 63(6):400-12. PubMed ID: 15252881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bandwidth determines modulatory effects of centrifugal pathways on cochlear hearing desensitization caused by loud sound. Rajan R Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(12):3589-600. PubMed ID: 17229107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Qualitative characteristics of masking the click with noise in the peripheral section of the auditory analyzer in cats]. LIANG CA; RADIONOVA EA Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1960 Dec; 46():1439-46. PubMed ID: 13761848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulation deafness: a study of hearing losses resulting from exposure to noise or to blast impulses. LINDQUIST SE; SCHUKNECHT HF J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1954 Oct; 47(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 13221693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The cochlear potentials and their relation to hearing. WEVER EG Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1959 Dec; 68():974-89. PubMed ID: 13844228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The cochlear potentials and their relation to hearing. WEVER EG Trans Am Otol Soc; 1959; 47():13-27. PubMed ID: 13844229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of operative changes in the sound-conducting apparatus on inner ear of guinea pig; detection of hearing power by measurement of cochlear potentials]. WAGEMANN W Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1953; 164(2):165-89. PubMed ID: 13139595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of intense sound, hypoxia and kanamycin on the permeability of cochlear partitions. MISRAHY GA; SPRADLEY JF; DZINOVIC S; BROOKS CJ Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1961 Jun; 70():572-81. PubMed ID: 13771302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear emissions simulated using one-dimensional model of cochlear hydrodynamics. Hubbard AE Hear Res; 1986; 21(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 3957798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cochlear interdependence; first experimental results]. MAYOUX R; MARTIN H Rev Otoneuroophtalmol; 1955; 27(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 13255520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A model for the nonlinear mechanism responsible for cochlear amplification. Fessel K; Holmes MH Math Biosci Eng; 2014 Dec; 11(6):1357-73. PubMed ID: 25365605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling of sound transmission from ear canal to cochlea. Gan RZ; Reeves BP; Wang X Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Dec; 35(12):2180-95. PubMed ID: 17882549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]