These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13743631)
1. Conditioned fear as a function of CS-UCS and probe stimulus intervals. ROSS LE J Exp Psychol; 1961 Apr; 61():271-3. PubMed ID: 13743631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In dubio pro defensio: initial activation of conditioned fear is not cue specific. Weike AI; Schupp HT; Hamm AO Behav Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 122(3):685-96. PubMed ID: 18513138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EFFECT OF CS-ONSET UCS-TERMINATION DELAY, UCS DURATION, CS-ONSET UCS-ONSET INTERVAL, AND NUMBER OF CS-UCS PAIRINGS ON CONDITIONED FEAR RESPONSE. STROUTHES A J Exp Psychol; 1965 Mar; 69():287-91. PubMed ID: 14271333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of continuous versus intermittent CS-UCS pairing on human brain activation during Pavlovian fear conditioning. Dunsmoor JE; Bandettini PA; Knight DC Behav Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 121(4):635-42. PubMed ID: 17663589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring the role of conditioning and stimulus generalisation in common fears and worries. Haddad AD; Xu M; Raeder S; Lau JY Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(5):914-22. PubMed ID: 23216275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal encoding in fear conditioning revealed through associative reflex facilitation. Lindquist DH; Brown TH Behav Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 118(2):395-402. PubMed ID: 15113266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural mechanisms underlying the conditioned diminution of the unconditioned fear response. Wood KH; Ver Hoef LW; Knight DC Neuroimage; 2012 Mar; 60(1):787-99. PubMed ID: 22227141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal specificity of fear conditioning: effects of different conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus intervals on the fear-potentiated startle effect. Davis M; Schlesinger LS; Sorenson CA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Oct; 15(4):295-310. PubMed ID: 2794867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acquired drive strength as a joint function of UCS intensity and number of CS-UCS pairings: the effect of masses and distributed CS-UCS pairings. Goldstein ML J Gen Psychol; 1976 Oct; 95(2d Half):257-86. PubMed ID: 1003186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reinstatement of extinguished conditioned responses and negative stimulus valence as a pathway to return of fear in humans. Dirikx T; Hermans D; Vansteenwegen D; Baeyens F; Eelen P Learn Mem; 2004; 11(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 15466307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dissociation of neural responses and skin conductance reactions during fear conditioning with and without awareness of stimulus contingencies. Tabbert K; Stark R; Kirsch P; Vaitl D Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):761-70. PubMed ID: 16651009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Expression of conditional fear with and without awareness. Knight DC; Nguyen HT; Bandettini PA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Dec; 100(25):15280-3. PubMed ID: 14657356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observational fear conditioning in the acquisition and extinction of attentional bias for threat: an experimental evaluation. Kelly MM; Forsyth JP Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):324-35. PubMed ID: 17516811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of continuous and partial reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of human conditioned fear. Grady AK; Bowen KH; Hyde AT; Totsch SK; Knight DC Behav Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 130(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 26692449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conditioned diminution of the unconditioned skin conductance response. Knight DC; Lewis EP; Wood KH Behav Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 125(4):626-31. PubMed ID: 21688887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An appetitive conditioned stimulus enhances fear acquisition and impairs fear extinction. Leung HT; Holmes NM; Westbrook RF Learn Mem; 2016 Mar; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 26884229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulus compounding in classical fear conditioning. Goldstein ML J Gen Psychol; 1975 Apr; 92(2d Half):261-6. PubMed ID: 1141875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Altered cingulate and amygdala response towards threat and safe cues in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Maier SJ; Szalkowski A; Kamphausen S; Feige B; Perlov E; Kalisch R; Jacob GA; Philipsen A; Tüscher O; Tebartz van Elst L Psychol Med; 2014 Jan; 44(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 23510549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal and ventral hippocampus impair acquisition and expression of trace-conditioned fear-potentiated startle in rats. Trivedi MA; Coover GD Behav Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 168(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 16413066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A meta-analysis of instructed fear studies: implications for conscious appraisal of threat. Mechias ML; Etkin A; Kalisch R Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1760-8. PubMed ID: 19786103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]