98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1374705)
1. ERP components related to stimulus selection processes.
Paz-Caballero MD; García-Austt E
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 May; 82(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 1374705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A topographic study of ERPs elicited by visual feature discrimination.
O'Donnell BF; Swearer JM; Smith LT; Hokama H; McCarley RW
Brain Topogr; 1997; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 9455604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age-related changes in event-related potentials in visual discrimination tasks.
Tachibana H; Aragane K; Sugita M
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 100(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 17441300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attention to detail: why considering task demands is essential for single-trial analysis of BOLD correlates of the visual P1 and N1.
Warbrick T; Arrubla J; Boers F; Neuner I; Shah NJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):529-42. PubMed ID: 24047390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modulation of event-related potentials in normal human subjects by visual divided attention to spatial and color factors.
Omoto S; Kuroiwa Y; Li M; Doi H; Shimamura M; Koyano S; Segawa H; Suzuki Y
Neurosci Lett; 2001 Oct; 311(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 11578828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aging effects on selective attention-related electroencephalographic patterns during face encoding.
Deiber MP; Rodriguez C; Jaques D; Missonnier P; Emch J; Millet P; Gold G; Giannakopoulos P; Ibañez V
Neuroscience; 2010 Nov; 171(1):173-86. PubMed ID: 20801196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. P3a from a passive visual stimulus task.
Jeon YW; Polich J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Dec; 112(12):2202-8. PubMed ID: 11738190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are objects the same as groups? ERP correlates of spatial attentional guidance by irrelevant feature similarity.
Kasai T; Moriya H; Hirano S
Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():49-58. PubMed ID: 21652032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex.
Khoe W; Freeman E; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 16500628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ERPs in an oddball task under vection-inducing visual stimulation.
Stróżak P; Francuz P; Augustynowicz P; Ratomska M; Fudali-Czyż A; Bałaj B
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Dec; 234(12):3473-3482. PubMed ID: 27488367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
Sawaki R; Katayama J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The hemispherical laterality of the visual evoked potentials during simple dot stimulus in normal human subjects.
Omoto S; Kuroiwa Y; Li M; Kamitani T
Neurosci Lett; 2000 Nov; 294(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 11058794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developmental changes in point-light walker processing during childhood and adolescence: an event-related potential study.
Hirai M; Watanabe S; Honda Y; Kakigi R
Neuroscience; 2009 Jun; 161(1):311-25. PubMed ID: 19303916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cortical configuration by stimulus onset visual evoked potentials (SO-VEPs) predicts performance on a motion direction discrimination task.
Zalar B; Martin T; Kavcic V
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 25889693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
Jia H; Li H; Yu D
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
