These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13772455)
1. [Complications and failures of oculo-orbital implants]. MORAX PV; VERGEZ A; AMAR L Annee Ther Clin Ophtalmol; 1959; 10():191-201. PubMed ID: 13772455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Use of artificial resin in the manufacture of ocular prostheses and orbital implants]. FENNER W Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild; 1950; 116(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 15437754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Orbital implants; the development of movable ocular prostheses. CHOYCE DP Bibl Ophthalmol; 1955; (42):1-18. PubMed ID: 13260161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Status of positive contact orbital implants. HOUSE RC Tex State J Med; 1953 Mar; 49(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 13038729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Results with orbital implants. van der HELM F Ophthalmologica; 1962; 143():122-5. PubMed ID: 13906322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The present status of orbital implants and prostheses. HUDSON JR Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K; 1956; 76():245-52. PubMed ID: 13457338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved orbital implant. ARRUGA H Am J Ophthalmol; 1954 Jul; 38(1 1):93-6. PubMed ID: 13180612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. EXPERIENCES WITH DIFFERENT ORBITAL IMPLANTS AFTER ENUCLEATION. CASTREN JA Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1963; 41():435-44. PubMed ID: 14048663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple form of orbital implant. RING CC Trans Ophthalmol Soc N Z; 1955; 8():67-9. PubMed ID: 13380981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Technic of our orbital implant]. MOURA-BRAZIL N Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1955 Nov; (9):596-601. PubMed ID: 13293486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Tolerance of orbital implants made of hydrocolloid acrylate]. DREIFUS M; HERBEN T; LIM D; WICHTERLE O Sb Lek; 1960 Jul; 62():212-8. PubMed ID: 13818033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between motility of biointegratable and silicone orbital implants. Yazici B Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):786-7; author reply 787. PubMed ID: 17964325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hydroxyapatite implants. Jordan DR Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2320-1; author reply 2321. PubMed ID: 19041493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pegging porous polyethylene implants. Jordan DR Arch Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 119(9):1393-5. PubMed ID: 11545658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Repair of orbital defects with implant-retained prostheses]. Wang Y; Lin Y; Cui H Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 19(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 15921323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary placement of hydroxyapatite-coated sleeves in bioceramic orbital implants. Jordan DR Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 139(2):333-4. PubMed ID: 15733997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of the cosmetic effect of orbital endoimplantation after removal the eyeball]. Piskiniene R Medicina (Kaunas); 2006; 42(9):717-24. PubMed ID: 17028469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quasi-integrated buried muscle cone implant with good motility and advantages for prostetic fitting. ALLEN L; FERGUSON EC; BRALEY AE Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1960; 64():272-86. PubMed ID: 13792763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]