These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13775453)
1. Comparative evaluation of oral cholecystographic media. TATELMAN M; STEEL WB J Mich State Med Soc; 1961 Mar; 60():357-60. PubMed ID: 13775453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of two recently introduced oral cholecystographic media. MCCORT J Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1957 Jan; 77(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 13381857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of some cholecystographic media on the size of the gallbladder. ANDREN L; THEANDER G Acta Radiol (Stockh); 1961 Mar; 55():217-20. PubMed ID: 13683427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Telepaque and priodax, gallbladder media; a comparative study. GRUNOE OH Tex State J Med; 1952 Aug; 48(8):596-600. PubMed ID: 12995312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A double-blind study of oral cholecystographic media: orabilex and telepaque. MORGAN LA; PARKS RE Radiology; 1960 Mar; 74():436-41. PubMed ID: 14424118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Anaphylactoid reaction following the oral administration of iodide-containing cholecystographic media. ARMEN RN; COHEN SG; KANTOR M J Allergy; 1956 Nov; 27(6):544-7. PubMed ID: 13366557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative evaluation of intravenous pyelographic media. BOHNE AW; DREW DR AMA Arch Surg; 1956 Dec; 73(6):927-30. PubMed ID: 13372013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of media used in bronchography. WEBB WR; WOFFORD JL J Int Coll Surg; 1957 Jan; 27(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 13385534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of two cholecystographic media. STEVENSON CA; SMITH RN Tex State J Med; 1946 Dec; 42(8):492-4. PubMed ID: 20276716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of two recently developed urographic media. TAYLOR JN; GENTERS KW Ohio State Med J; 1958 Jul; 54(7):913-4. PubMed ID: 13553230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of opaque media in chiropodical roentgenology. CALMENSON K J Natl Assoc Chirop; 1956 Feb; 46(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 13286700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Some notes on opaque media. ARDLEY DG Radiography; 1956 Feb; 22(254):26-8. PubMed ID: 13290028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hysterosalpingography; a survey of some opaque media. SHEACH JM J Fac Radiol; 1959 Apr; 10(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 24545252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Urographic media; a study of the relative merits of urografin 60 per cent and hypaque 45 per cent. CABLE R J Fac Radiol; 1959 Apr; 10(2):100-2. PubMed ID: 24545251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The current status of bronchography with water-soluble media; a report of 74 examinations with xumbradil viscous B. NIKNEJAD I; AURELIUS JR; PETERSON DH; RIGLER LG Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1956 Apr; 75(4):701-19. PubMed ID: 13302534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Proetz with water-soluble media in the x-ray diagnosis of paranasal sinuses]. PERUZZI G; BOSATRA A Arch Radiol; 1954; 29(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 14362882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The reaction of the lung on bronchography with water soluble contrast media in rats; comparison between two media. HELLSTROM B Acta Radiol (Stockh); 1953 Oct; 40(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 13124060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]