These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13807306)

  • 1. Resistance to extinction as a function of number of shock-termination reinforcements.
    CAMPBELL SL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1959 Dec; 52():754-8. PubMed ID: 13807306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EFFECT OF N-LENGTH, NUMBER OF DIFFERENT N-LENGTHS, AND NUMBER OF REINFORCEMENTS ON RESISTANCE TO EXTINCTION.
    CAPALDI EJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Sep; 68():230-9. PubMed ID: 14215420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resistance to extinction when partial reinforcement is followed by regular reinforcement.
    JENKINS HM
    J Exp Psychol; 1962 Nov; 64():441-50. PubMed ID: 13964626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expectation and resistance to extinction of a leverpulling response as a function of percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials.
    LEWIS DJ; DUNCAN CP
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Feb; 55(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 13513924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resistance to extinction and rate of lever-pulling as a function of percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials.
    CARMENT DW; MILES CG
    Can J Psychol; 1962 Jun; 16():145-51. PubMed ID: 13876680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative resistance to extinction of aperiodic and continuous reinforcement separately and in combination.
    LIKELY FA
    J Gen Psychol; 1958 Apr; 58(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 13539355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resistance to extinction following periodic reinforcement in the presence of a discriminative stimulus.
    DINSMOOR JA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1952 Feb; 45(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 14907930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A demonstration of superior resistance to extinction following continuous reinforcement as compared with partial reinforcement.
    RUBIN LS
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1953 Feb; 46(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 13034949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partial (periodic) vs. continuous reinforcement in resistance to extinction.
    JENKINS WO; RIGBY MK
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1950 Feb; 43(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 15410046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of partial reinforcement with spaced practice on resistance to extinction in the fish.
    LONGO N; BITTERMAN ME
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1960 Apr; 53():169-72. PubMed ID: 14418167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expectation and resistance to extinction of a lever-pulling response as functions of percentage of reinforcement and amount of reward.
    LEWIS DJ; DUNCAN CP
    J Exp Psychol; 1957 Aug; 54(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 13475636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RESISTANCE TO EXTINCTION IN THE RAT AS A FUNCTION OF PERCENTAGE AND DISTRIBUTION OF REINFORCEMENT.
    GONZALEZ RC; BITTERMAN ME
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1964 Oct; 58():258-63. PubMed ID: 14215400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extinction in the fish after partial and consistent reinforcement with number of reinforcements equated.
    GONZALEZ RC; ESKIN RM; BITTERMAN ME
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1962 Jun; 55():381-6. PubMed ID: 13900214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Studies in learning and motivation; equal reinforcements in both end-boxes; followed by shock in one end-box.
    TOLMAN EC; GLEITMAN H
    J Exp Psychol; 1949 Dec; 39(6):810-9. PubMed ID: 15398592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Producing either positive or negative tendencies to a stimulus associated with shock.
    EVANS WO
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Jul; 5(3):335-7. PubMed ID: 13891032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On secondary reinforcement and shock termination.
    BECK RC
    Psychol Bull; 1961 Jan; 58():28-45. PubMed ID: 13688405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partial reinforcement of avoidance and resistance to extinction in humans.
    Xia W; Dymond S; Lloyd K; Vervliet B
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Sep; 96():79-89. PubMed ID: 28416167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ATTITUDE STATEMENTS AS POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENTS.
    GOLIGHTLY C; BYRNE D
    Science; 1964 Nov; 146(3645):798-9. PubMed ID: 14197577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Secondary reinforcing and motivating properties of stimuli contiguous with shock onset and termination.
    GOODSON FE; BROWNSTEIN A
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1955 Oct; 48(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 13271605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variables in spatial learning; number of reinforcements during training.
    KENDLER HH; GASSER WP
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1948 Jun; 41(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 18867072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.