These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1381126)
1. A rapid method for detection of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:3 in pig feces using monoclonal antibodies. Li Q; DiSanto ME; Magee WE Vet Microbiol; 1992 Jul; 32(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 1381126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for pathogenic serogroups O:3, O:8, and O:9 of Yersinia enterocolitica. Schmidt M; Sethi KK Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1987 Jun; 265(1-2):113-23. PubMed ID: 3314254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 specific antibodies in experimentally infected pigs by an indirect LPS ELISA. Nielsen B; Wingstrand A; Heisel C Contrib Microbiol Immunol; 1995; 13():117-9. PubMed ID: 8833811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of an LPS-based ELISA for diagnosis of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 infections in Danish patients: a follow-up study. Dalby T; Rasmussen E; Schiellerup P; Krogfelt KA BMC Microbiol; 2017 May; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28545413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs. Riber U; Jungersen G Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2007 Mar; 116(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 17270281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The serodiagnosis of human infections with Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Chart H; Cheasty T FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 47(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 16872375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Incidence of antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica in swine sera in relation to the serological differentiation of Brucella infections]. Schmittdiel E; von Wangenheim B; Chorherr S Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 98(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3985937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Immunological characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and O:3 LPS antigens by monoclonal antibodies. Weninger J; Wartenberg K; Röllinghoff M Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1988 Nov; 269(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 3218391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of an ELISA procedure to detect swine carriers of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Thibodeau V; Frost EH; Quessy S Vet Microbiol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 11470546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs. Nielsen K; Smith P; Yu W; Nicoletti P; Jungersen G; Stack J; Godfroid J Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2006 Jan; 109(1-2):69-78. PubMed ID: 16140390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of O-polysaccharide specific monoclonal antibodies derived from mice infected with the rough Brucella melitensis strain B115. Cloeckaert A; Zygmunt MS; Dubray G; Limet JN J Gen Microbiol; 1993 Jul; 139(7):1551-6. PubMed ID: 7690392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of rabbit antibodies for immunochemical detection of Yersinia enterocolitica. Hochel I; Skvor J Folia Microbiol (Praha); 2007; 52(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 18298049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monoclonal antibodies reacting selectively with core and O-polysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 lipopolysaccharide. Pekkola-Heino K; Viljanen MK; Ståhlberg TH; Granfors K; Toivanen A Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand C; 1987 Feb; 95(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 3554894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time course of the serological response to Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 in experimentally infected pigs. Nielsen B; Heisel C; Wingstrand A Vet Microbiol; 1996 Feb; 48(3-4):293-303. PubMed ID: 9054125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. Garin-Bastuji B; Hummel N; Gerbier G; Cau C; Pouillot R; Da Costa M; Fontaine JJ Vet Microbiol; 1999 Apr; 66(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 10227124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of culture methods for rapid screening of swine faecal samples for Yersinia enterocolitica O:3/biotype 4. Hoorfar J; Holmvig CB Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1999 Apr; 46(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 10337241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence and Dynamics of Pathogenic Koskinen J; Keto-Timonen R; Virtanen S; Vilar MJ; Korkeala H Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2019 Dec; 16(12):831-839. PubMed ID: 31355682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Serological confirmation of Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 O-antigens by monoclonal antibodies. Bundle DR; Gidney MA; Perry MB; Duncan JR; Cherwonogrodzky JW Infect Immun; 1984 Nov; 46(2):389-93. PubMed ID: 6437982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid detection of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:3 using a duplex PCR assay. Rusak LA; de Castro Lisboa Pereira R; Freitag IG; Hofer CB; Hofer E; Asensi MD; Vallim DC J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():107-111. PubMed ID: 30366064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ecological studies of Yersinia enterocolitica. III. Cross-protection against fecal excretion between Y. enterocolitica serovars 3 and 5.27 in pigs. Fukushima H; Ito Y; Saito K; Tsubokura M; Otsuki K Vet Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 9(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 6495608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]