95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13818033)
1. [Tolerance of orbital implants made of hydrocolloid acrylate].
DREIFUS M; HERBEN T; LIM D; WICHTERLE O
Sb Lek; 1960 Jul; 62():212-8. PubMed ID: 13818033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An impression technique for implant-retained orbital prostheses.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Korkmaz T
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 18589075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anterior key method for indexing orbital prostheses.
Chambers MS; Lemon JC; Martin JW
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 11807492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late follow-up of acrylic magnetic orbital implants.
Myska V; Roper-Hall MJ
Proc R Soc Med; 1970 Mar; 63(3):315-7. PubMed ID: 5445589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Technique for fabricating a lightweight, urethane-lined silicone orbital prosthesis.
Kiat-amnuay S; Lemon JC; Wesley PJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 11514811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RECONSTRUCTION OF THE COMMON BILE DUCT WITH AN ACRYLATE-AMIDE PROSTHESIS.
SHERMAN RT; JACKSON TM; NIELSON CA; WILSON H
Ann Surg; 1963 Sep; 158(3):420-30. PubMed ID: 14061708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Use of artificial resin in the manufacture of ocular prostheses and orbital implants].
FENNER W
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild; 1950; 116(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 15437754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Painting eyes; dental technician and acrylic prosthesis.
HARTZFELD EG
Hosp Corps Q; 1949 Feb; 22(1):22. PubMed ID: 18119625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Studies on the tolerance of acrylate lenses in aphakic rabbits].
GALLI L
Ophthalmologica; 1962; 144():111-25. PubMed ID: 13896443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Radiation absorption and primary acrylate endo-prostheses in gnathosurgery].
SCHLEGEL D; WAGNER G
Med Monatsschr; 1962 Jan; 16():28-33. PubMed ID: 14498515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Orbital implants; the development of movable ocular prostheses.
CHOYCE DP
Bibl Ophthalmol; 1955; (42):1-18. PubMed ID: 13260161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Status of positive contact orbital implants.
HOUSE RC
Tex State J Med; 1953 Mar; 49(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 13038729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The fused orbital implant. Five years' experience.
Milauskas AT
Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1970; 74(6):1296-306. PubMed ID: 5493414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Results with orbital implants.
van der HELM F
Ophthalmologica; 1962; 143():122-5. PubMed ID: 13906322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The present status of orbital implants and prostheses.
HUDSON JR
Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K; 1956; 76():245-52. PubMed ID: 13457338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Complications and failures of oculo-orbital implants].
MORAX PV; VERGEZ A; AMAR L
Annee Ther Clin Ophtalmol; 1959; 10():191-201. PubMed ID: 13772455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A new orbital implant of fused acrylic plastic.
Milauskas AT
Am J Ophthalmol; 1966 Jun; 61(6):1443-8. PubMed ID: 5938312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved orbital implant.
ARRUGA H
Am J Ophthalmol; 1954 Jul; 38(1 1):93-6. PubMed ID: 13180612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [New plastic bandages with acrylate bases].
MACIK I; VOLEK M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 1961 Oct; 28():397-8. PubMed ID: 14467907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple form of orbital implant.
RING CC
Trans Ophthalmol Soc N Z; 1955; 8():67-9. PubMed ID: 13380981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
