These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13823280)

  • 1. Variability of responses and the stability of scores and interpretations of projective protocols.
    FISKE DW
    J Proj Tech; 1959 Sep; 23():263-7. PubMed ID: 13823280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The validity of thematic projective technique interpretations.
    LITTLE KB; SHNEIDMAN ES
    J Pers; 1955 Mar; 23(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 14354599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The stability of interpretations of sentence completion tests.
    FISKE DW; VAN BUSKIRK C
    J Consult Psychol; 1959 Apr; 23(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 13641516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity of projective interpretations of art products of mentally retarded individuals.
    POPPLESTONE JA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1954 Oct; 59(2):263-5. PubMed ID: 13197440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of clinicians' judgments from projective test protocols.
    HOROWITZ MJ
    J Consult Psychol; 1962 Jun; 26():251-6. PubMed ID: 14449004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of projective techniques in pediatric nursing research from 1984 to 1993.
    Bellack JP; Fleming JW
    J Pediatr Nurs; 1996 Feb; 11(1):10-28. PubMed ID: 8867218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The case of Jay: interpretations and discussion.
    SHNEIDMAN ES; BELL JE; FINE R; HOLT RR; KUTASH SB; VORHAUS PG
    J Proj Tech; 1952 Dec; 16(4):444-5. PubMed ID: 13011744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra-individual variability in sentence completion responses.
    OSTERWEIL J; FISKE DW
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1956 Mar; 52(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 13306432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The semantic validity of TAT interpretations.
    DAVENPORT BF
    J Consult Psychol; 1952 Jun; 16(3):71-5. PubMed ID: 14946280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring achievement motivation with picture interpretations.
    MORGAN HH
    J Consult Psychol; 1953 Aug; 17(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 13096631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Projective assessment of Latinos in the United States: current realities, problems, and prospects.
    Dana RH
    Cult Divers Ment Health; 1998; 4(3):165-84. PubMed ID: 9713158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of projective techniques in the investigation of emotional aspects of general medical disorders. II. Other projective techniques and suggestions for experimental design.
    BELL A; TROSMAN H; ROSS D
    J Proj Tech; 1953 Mar; 17(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 13053475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [From the projective tests to the projective method].
    LIONNET A
    Psyche Rev Int Sci Homme Psychanal; 1951 Feb; 6(52):98-120. PubMed ID: 14834244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of Rorschach interpretations on intellectual functioning of adjusted, questionably adjusted, and maladjusted subjects.
    BEIER EG
    J Proj Tech; 1953 Mar; 17(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 13053477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The availability of conflictful ideas: a neglected parameter in assessing projective test responses.
    KAGAN J; MOSS HA
    J Pers; 1961 Jun; 29():217-34. PubMed ID: 13750698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Projective techniques: an international perspective.
    Piotrowski C; Keller JW; Ogawa T
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Feb; 72(1):179-82. PubMed ID: 8451352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Projective techniques at midcentury: a retrospective review of An introduction to projective techniques by Harold H. Anderson and Gladys L. Anderson.
    Rabin AI
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Apr; 76(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 11393465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The validity of projective techniques and their research and clinical contribution.
    Blatt SJ
    J Pers Assess; 1975 Aug; 39(4):327-43. PubMed ID: 1104801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theoretical considerations concerning the scope and limitations of projective techniques.
    KORNER AF
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1950 Oct; 45(4):619-27. PubMed ID: 14803170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defining projective techniques: finding common ground for discourse.
    Wagner EE
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 1):951-6. PubMed ID: 12841470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.