These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13840098)

  • 1. Bacterial aerosol samplers. III. Comparison of biological and physical effects in liquid impinger samplers.
    TYLER ME; SHIPE EL; PAINTER RB
    Appl Microbiol; 1959 Nov; 7(6):355-62. PubMed ID: 13840098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bacterial aerosol samplers. I. Development and evaluation of the all-glass impinger.
    TYLER ME; SHIPE EL
    Appl Microbiol; 1959 Nov; 7(6):337-49. PubMed ID: 13840099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Personal air samplers for measuring occupational exposures to biological hazards.
    Macher JM; First MW
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Feb; 45(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 6702610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.
    Furuhashi M; Miyamae T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of the air sampling method on the recovery of Mycoplasma gallisepticum from experimentally produced aerosols.
    Landman WJ; Feberwee A; van Eck JH
    Vet Q; 2013 Jun; 33(2):54-9. PubMed ID: 23705990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV).
    Zhao Y; Aarnink AJ; Wang W; Fabri T; Groot Koerkamp PW; de Jong MC
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2014; 21(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 25292111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bacterial aerosol samplers. II. Development and evaluation of the Shipe sampler.
    SHIPE EL; TYLER ME; CHAPMAN DN
    Appl Microbiol; 1959 Nov; 7(6):349-54. PubMed ID: 14446038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The critical-orifice liquid impinger as a sampler for bacterial aerosols.
    COWN WB; KETHLEY TW; FINCHER EL
    Appl Microbiol; 1957 Mar; 5(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 13425529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Precision of the all-glass impinger and the andersen microbial impactor for air sampling in solid-waste handling facilities.
    Lembke LL; Kniseley RN; van Nostrand RC; Hale MD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Aug; 42(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 7025757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.
    Jensen PA; Todd WF; Davis GN; Scarpino PV
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Oct; 53(10):660-7. PubMed ID: 1456208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of high-volume air sampling equipment for viral aerosol sampling during emergency response.
    Cooper C; Slagley J; Lohaus J; Escamilla E; Bliss C; Semler D; Felker D; Smith D; Ott D
    J Emerg Manag; 2014; 12(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 24828912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two biological aerosol sampling methods.
    Zimmerman NJ; Reist PC; Turner AG
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Jan; 53(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 3548593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY OF SOME TYPES OF SAMPLERS OF AIRBORNE BACTERIA WITH THE USE OF MONO- AND POLYDISPERSE INERT AEROSOLS].
    MAMMARELLA ST
    Riv Med Aeronaut Spaz; 1965; 28():62-76. PubMed ID: 14305090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-Flow-Rate Impinger for the Study of Concentration, Viability, Metabolic Activity, and Ice-Nucleation Activity of Airborne Bacteria.
    Šantl-Temkiv T; Amato P; Gosewinkel U; Thyrhaug R; Charton A; Chicot B; Finster K; Bratbak G; Löndahl J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Oct; 51(19):11224-11234. PubMed ID: 28836763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of four bioaerosol samplers in the outdoor environment.
    Cage BR; Schreiber K; Barnes C; Portnoy J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Nov; 77(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 8933779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multistage liquid impinger.
    May KR
    Bacteriol Rev; 1966 Sep; 30(3):559-70. PubMed ID: 5917336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of coliphage and bacterial aerosols at a wastewater spray irrigation site.
    Bausum HT; Schaub SA; Kenyon KF; Small MJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Jan; 43(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 7055376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collection efficiencies of aerosol samplers for virus-containing aerosols.
    Tseng CC; Li CS
    J Aerosol Sci; 2005; 36(5):593-607. PubMed ID: 32287372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The efficiency of various liquid impinger samplers in bacterial aerosols.
    MAY KR; HARPER GJ
    Br J Ind Med; 1957 Oct; 14(4):287-97. PubMed ID: 13471876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.