These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1385499)
1. Accuracy of in-vivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography. Rahmouni A; Yang A; Tempany CM; Frenkel T; Epstein J; Walsh P; Leichner PK; Ricci C; Zerhouni E J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(6):935-40. PubMed ID: 1385499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens. Lee JS; Chung BH Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Tewari A; Indudhara R; Shinohara K; Schalow E; Woods M; Lee R; Anderson C; Narayan P J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 May; 24(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8727414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostatic volume. al-Rimawi M; Griffiths DJ; Boake RC; Mador DR; Johnson MA Br J Urol; 1994 Nov; 74(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 7530124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy. Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study. Massanova M; Robertson S; Barone B; Dutto L; Caputo VF; Bhatt JR; Ahmad I; Bada M; Obeidallah A; Crocetto F Urol Int; 2021; 105(9-10):804-810. PubMed ID: 34247169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods. Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies. Piert M; Montgomery J; Kunju LP; Siddiqui J; Rogers V; Rajendiran T; Johnson TD; Shao X; Davenport MS J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1065-70. PubMed ID: 26985061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate? Nathan MS; Seenivasagam K; Mei Q; Wickham JE; Miller RA Br J Urol; 1996 Mar; 77(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8814846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hematospermia--the added value of transrectal ultrasound to clinical evaluation: is transrectal ultrasound necessary for evaluation of hematospermia? Raviv G; Laufer M; Miki H Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(5):913-6. PubMed ID: 23845256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer. Boesen L Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance? Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of sonographic pattern in prostatic cancer: comparison of longitudinal and transversal transrectal ultrasound with subsequent radical prostatectomy specimens. Jansen H; Gallee MP; Schröder FH Eur Urol; 1990; 18(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 2261928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of transrectal and transabodominal ultrasound measurement of transition zone volume with post-operative enucleated adenoma volume in benign prostatic hypertrophy. Ajayi I; Aremu A; Olajide A; Bello T; Olajide F; Adetiloye V Pan Afr Med J; 2013; 16():149. PubMed ID: 24876907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of urologists and radiologists. Nunez-Nateras R; Andrews JR; Martin GL; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR; Ferrigni RG; Eversman WG; Castle EP Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):4985-8. PubMed ID: 20156377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The weight of the prostate gland is an excellent surrogate for gland volume. Varma M; Morgan JM Histopathology; 2010 Jul; 57(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 20653780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of image fusion in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. Selli C; Caramella D; Giusti S; Conti A; Tognetti A; Mogorovich A; De Maria M; Bartolozzi C Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17310289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volume determinations by transrectal ultrasonography in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation with removed prostate weight. Alkan I; Türkeri L; Biren T; Cevik I; Akdaş A Int Urol Nephrol; 1996; 28(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 9119637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Seminal vesicle volume as a sonographic predictor of prostate cancer stage. Cummings JM; Boullier JA; Sankari BR; Parra RO Urology; 1994 Aug; 44(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 8048195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size. Rodriguez E; Skarecky D; Narula N; Ahlering TE J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]