215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1385499)
1. Accuracy of in-vivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography.
Rahmouni A; Yang A; Tempany CM; Frenkel T; Epstein J; Walsh P; Leichner PK; Ricci C; Zerhouni E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(6):935-40. PubMed ID: 1385499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Lee JS; Chung BH
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Tewari A; Indudhara R; Shinohara K; Schalow E; Woods M; Lee R; Anderson C; Narayan P
J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 May; 24(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8727414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostatic volume.
al-Rimawi M; Griffiths DJ; Boake RC; Mador DR; Johnson MA
Br J Urol; 1994 Nov; 74(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 7530124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
Massanova M; Robertson S; Barone B; Dutto L; Caputo VF; Bhatt JR; Ahmad I; Bada M; Obeidallah A; Crocetto F
Urol Int; 2021; 105(9-10):804-810. PubMed ID: 34247169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.
Piert M; Montgomery J; Kunju LP; Siddiqui J; Rogers V; Rajendiran T; Johnson TD; Shao X; Davenport MS
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1065-70. PubMed ID: 26985061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate?
Nathan MS; Seenivasagam K; Mei Q; Wickham JE; Miller RA
Br J Urol; 1996 Mar; 77(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8814846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hematospermia--the added value of transrectal ultrasound to clinical evaluation: is transrectal ultrasound necessary for evaluation of hematospermia?
Raviv G; Laufer M; Miki H
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(5):913-6. PubMed ID: 23845256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of sonographic pattern in prostatic cancer: comparison of longitudinal and transversal transrectal ultrasound with subsequent radical prostatectomy specimens.
Jansen H; Gallee MP; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 1990; 18(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 2261928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of transrectal and transabodominal ultrasound measurement of transition zone volume with post-operative enucleated adenoma volume in benign prostatic hypertrophy.
Ajayi I; Aremu A; Olajide A; Bello T; Olajide F; Adetiloye V
Pan Afr Med J; 2013; 16():149. PubMed ID: 24876907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of urologists and radiologists.
Nunez-Nateras R; Andrews JR; Martin GL; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR; Ferrigni RG; Eversman WG; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):4985-8. PubMed ID: 20156377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The weight of the prostate gland is an excellent surrogate for gland volume.
Varma M; Morgan JM
Histopathology; 2010 Jul; 57(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 20653780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of image fusion in the staging of prostatic carcinoma.
Selli C; Caramella D; Giusti S; Conti A; Tognetti A; Mogorovich A; De Maria M; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17310289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volume determinations by transrectal ultrasonography in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation with removed prostate weight.
Alkan I; Türkeri L; Biren T; Cevik I; Akdaş A
Int Urol Nephrol; 1996; 28(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 9119637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Seminal vesicle volume as a sonographic predictor of prostate cancer stage.
Cummings JM; Boullier JA; Sankari BR; Parra RO
Urology; 1994 Aug; 44(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 8048195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size.
Rodriguez E; Skarecky D; Narula N; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
