These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1385619)

  • 1. Reasoning with conditionals containing negated constituents.
    Oaksford M; Stenning K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jul; 18(4):835-54. PubMed ID: 1385619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transfer of conditional reasoning: effects of explanations and initial problem types.
    Klaczynski PA; Gelfand H; Reese HW
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):208-20. PubMed ID: 2927318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The elusive matching bias effect in the disjunctive selection task.
    Roberts MJ
    Exp Psychol; 2002; 49(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 12053535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two meanings of "if"? Individual differences in the interpretation of conditionals.
    Oberauer K; Geiger SM; Fischer K; Weidenfeld A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):790-819. PubMed ID: 17514595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.
    Weidenfeld A; Oberauer K; Hörnig R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Nov; 58(8):1479-513. PubMed ID: 16365951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Obligation conditionals in a nonstandard conditional selection task: general versus specific reasoning strategies as a false dichotomy.
    Langford PE
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1203-17. PubMed ID: 11272762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mental representation and hypothetico-deductive reasoning: the case of the THOG problem.
    Girotto V; Legrenzi P
    Psychol Res; 1989; 51(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 2608865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proof construction: adolescent development from inductive to deductive problem-solving strategies.
    Foltz C; Overton WF; Ricco RB
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Apr; 59(2):179-95. PubMed ID: 7722434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misinterpretation of conditional statements in Wason's selection task.
    Osman M; Laming D
    Psychol Res; 2001; 65(2):128-44. PubMed ID: 11414005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analogical transfer in the THOG task.
    Koenig CS; Griggs RA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):557-70. PubMed ID: 15204141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social roles and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals.
    Manktelow KI; Over DE
    Cognition; 1991 May; 39(2):85-105. PubMed ID: 1934982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning.
    Thompson VA
    Cognition; 2000 Sep; 76(3):209-68. PubMed ID: 10913577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Set-shifting and inhibition interplay affect the rule-matching bias occurrence during conditional reasoning task.
    Hashemi SFS; Khosrowabadi R; Karimi M
    J Med Life; 2022 Jun; 15(6):828-834. PubMed ID: 35928360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Syllogistic reasoning time: disconfirmation disconfirmed.
    Thompson VA; Striemer CL; Reikoff R; Gunter RW; Campbell JI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):184-9. PubMed ID: 12747506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Counterexamples in sentential reasoning.
    Johnson-Laird PN; Hasson U
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1105-13. PubMed ID: 14704025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts.
    Geiger SM; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2060-74. PubMed ID: 18265621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning.
    Markovits H; Forgues HL; Brunet ML
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):736-47. PubMed ID: 22287219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The difference between generating counter examples and using them during reasoning.
    Verschueren N; Schaeken W; De Neys W; d'Ydewalle G
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1285-308. PubMed ID: 15513247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference.
    Oaksford M; Chater N; Larkin J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):883-99. PubMed ID: 10946369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories.
    Oberauer K
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov; 53(3):238-83. PubMed ID: 16729993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.