These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1386138)

  • 21. Sample size adjustment based on promising interim results and its application in confirmatory clinical trials.
    Chen YH; Li C; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2015 Dec; 12(6):584-95. PubMed ID: 26195615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distribution of the two-sample t-test statistic following blinded sample size re-estimation.
    Lu K
    Pharm Stat; 2016 May; 15(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 26865383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How meta-analysis increases statistical power.
    Cohn LD; Becker BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Sep; 8(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 14596489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exact test size and power of a Gaussian error linear model for an internal pilot study.
    Coffey CS; Muller KE
    Stat Med; 1999 May; 18(10):1199-214. PubMed ID: 10363340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The importance of a priori sample size estimation in strength and conditioning research.
    Beck TW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Aug; 27(8):2323-37. PubMed ID: 23880657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Planning sample sizes when effect sizes are uncertain: The power-calibrated effect size approach.
    McShane BB; Böckenholt U
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 26651984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The fallacy of enrolling only high-risk subjects in cancer prevention trials: is there a "free lunch"?
    Baker SG; Kramer BS; Corle D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Oct; 4():24. PubMed ID: 15461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The power of tests for bioequivalence in feed experiments with poultry.
    Roush WB; Tozer PR
    J Anim Sci; 2004; 82 E-Suppl():E110-118. PubMed ID: 15471790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Concepts in sample size determination.
    Rao UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 23422614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Overcoming feelings of powerlessness in "aging" researchers: a primer on statistical power in analysis of variance designs.
    Levin JR
    Psychol Aging; 1997 Mar; 12(1):84-106. PubMed ID: 9100270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Power of testing proportions in small two-sample studies when sample sizes are equal.
    Davis AB
    Stat Med; 1993 Apr; 12(8):777-87. PubMed ID: 8516594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The evaluation of endpoint variability and implications for study statistical power and sample size in conscious instrumented dogs.
    Chiang AY; Guth BD; Pugsley MK; Foley CM; Doyle JM; Engwall MJ; Koerner JE; Parish ST; Dustan Sarazan R
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2018; 92():43-51. PubMed ID: 29505899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On sample size estimation and re-estimation adjusting for variability in confirmatory trials.
    Wu PS; Lin M; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 26378970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Power and sample size for random coefficient regression models in randomized experiments with monotone missing data.
    Hu N; Mackey H; Thomas R
    Biom J; 2021 Apr; 63(4):806-824. PubMed ID: 33586212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The group sequential triangular test for phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Bellissant E; Bénichou J; Chastang C
    Am J Clin Oncol; 1996 Aug; 19(4):422-30. PubMed ID: 8677918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Empowering research: statistical power in general practice research.
    Fox N; Mathers N
    Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 14(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 9283855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Analysis and importance of statistical power and sample size in empirical scientific research].
    Klimek KM
    Wiad Lek; 2008; 61(7-9):211-5. PubMed ID: 19172834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.